DC current -- Find the 3 currents in this Battery + Resistor circuit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a circuit problem involving three currents (I1, I2, I3) in a battery and resistor configuration using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). The user initially calculated I1 as 3 A, I2 as 1 A, and I3 as 2 A, but later corrected these values to I1 = 3.5 A and I2 = -2.5 A by adjusting the direction of the currents in the equations. The importance of correctly defining current directions and applying KVL and KCL accurately is emphasized for obtaining the correct results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Basic knowledge of circuit analysis techniques
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law (I = E / R)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced applications of Kirchhoff's Laws in complex circuits
  • Learn about the impact of internal resistance in real circuits
  • Explore techniques for analyzing circuits with multiple power sources
  • Practice solving circuit problems using simulation software like LTspice
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, circuit designers, and anyone interested in mastering circuit analysis techniques for solving complex electrical problems.

jake jungle
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2015-2-3_21-10-18.png


Find I1 , I2 and I3

Homework Equations


I = E / R
I3 = I1 - I2

The Attempt at a Solution


its the trouble with parallel different emf . I know a formula how to combine them into one but it needs inner resistance . i don't know how to do it with the ideal circuit . The combine emf will go to bigger emf or the sum of them ? and how to find the current then ? please help :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jake jungle said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 78584

Find I1 , I2 and I3

Homework Equations


I = E / R
I3 = I1 - I2

The Attempt at a Solution


its the trouble with parallel different emf . I know a formula how to combine them into one but it needs inner resistance . i don't know how to do it with the ideal circuit . The combine emf will go to bigger emf or the sum of them ? and how to find the current then ? please help :(
When in doubt, apply the basics: KVL and KCL. You've already written a correct KCL equation for the circuit. Now what can you do with KVL?
 
gneill said:
When in doubt, apply the basics: KVL and KCL. You've already written a correct KCL equation for the circuit. Now what can you do with KVL?

so i do it like this :
I1(2+4) +3I3 - 24 = 0 (KVL)
I2(5+1) + 3I3 - 12 = 0 (KVL)
I1 = I2 + I3 (KCL)

and i solve this and got I1 = 3 A , I2 = 1A , I3 = 2A
Am i wrong somewhere cause the answer should be I1=3.5A and I2 =2.5A instead
 
jake jungle said:
so i do it like this :
I1(2+4) +3I3 - 24 = 0 (KVL)
I2(5+1) + 3I3 - 12 = 0 (KVL)
I1 = I2 + I3 (KCL)

and i solve this and got I1 = 3 A , I2 = 1A , I3 = 2A
Am i wrong somewhere cause the answer should be I1=3.5A and I2 =2.5A instead
Yes, your second KVL equation is incorrect. You didn't take into account the defined direction of i3.
 
gneill said:
Yes, your second KVL equation is incorrect. You didn't take into account the defined direction of i3.

the direction of i2 and i3 quite confusing
so i reveresed the direction of i2 to apply KVL more easily , therefore i got these equations :
i1(2+4) +3i3 - 24 = 0 (KVL)
i2(5+1) + 3i3 +12 = 0 (KVL)
i3 = i1 + i2 (KCL)

and i got right answer i1 = 3.5A , i2 = -2.5A (due to reversing the direction )

However , if i don't reverse i2 , am i able to use kvl with the second loop ? cause the current is not in the same direction and it confused me .
 
Just leave the currents defined as they are on the diagram. That will make sure that the signs of the currents that you obtain will agree with their definitions on the circuit diagram.

When you do your "KVL walk" around the loop, if you pass though a resistor in the same direction as its current then you have a potential drop. If you pass through a resistor against the current flow then you have a potential rise. Write the signs of the terms in your KVL equiations accordingly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jake jungle
OK I got it , thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K