De Broglie-Bohm and the uncertainty principle

In summary: Yes, that's correct.Thank you both.In summary, according to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, is the universe, in its current state, the only one that could have evolved from its early conditions? While the theory does imply that the universe we inhabit is inevitable, it also includes the free will element, which makes it somewhat less predictable.
  • #1
Goodison_Lad
39
0
According to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, is the universe, in its current state, the only one that could have evolved from its early conditions?

In other words, because in the theory, each particle actually possesses well-defined position/momentum/trajectory, does the theory imply that the universe we inhabit, to the very finest detail, is inevitable from the initial conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Goodison_Lad said:
According to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, is the universe, in its current state, the only one that could have evolved from its early conditions?

In other words, because in the theory, each particle actually possesses well-defined position/momentum/trajectory, does the theory imply that the universe we inhabit, to the very finest detail, is inevitable from the initial conditions?

yes Goodison_lad...Inevitable but not completely predictable...:) (or inevitable to the point where life evolved enough to have free will)

One of the reasons (that it cannot be totally predictable), and there are many more, would be that:

when measuring/determining the conditions (at any point in time) you effect the conditions so it can never be totally predictable

All this is, of course, per De Broglie-Bohm hypothesis/interpretation...

however I would say that there is (human and to a lesser extent animal) free will and that we can change the course (of our lives) to some extent...

Whether the universe is inherently random or totally "inevitable" is not of much use...in my opinion...it's what we do with it?...
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thanks, San K. I'd forgotten about the free will element (there's a bunch of threads in the Philosophy section where they're slugging that one out!) but if we accept its existence, I can see how my free choices in setting up an experiment in a particular way could affect the outcomes and set my corner of the universe on a different course.

So, assuming for the sake of argument, a part of the universe where no life has evolved, would that part of the universe develop inexorably along exactly the same lines as it already has? You hinted at other sources of unpredictability - but would these just represent a limit on our knowledge (according to De Broglie-Bohm) rather than some intrinsic 'anything could happen next' type of uncertainty, as present in other QM interpretetations?
 
  • #4
Goodison_Lad said:
So, assuming for the sake of argument, a part of the universe where no life has evolved, would that part of the universe develop inexorably along exactly the same lines as it already has?

I think yes, like a balls on a billiard table...per De Broglie-Bohm hypothesis/assumption

The De Brogile interpretation is deterministic

and also, of course, the assumption that --- the experimental part of the universe is insulated from the rest of the universe for the duration of the experiment/observation

Goodison_Lad said:
You hinted at other sources of unpredictability - but would these just represent a limit on our knowledge (according to De Broglie-Bohm) rather than some intrinsic 'anything could happen next' type of uncertainty, as present in other QM interpretetations?

yes...per De Broglie-Bohm theory...the De Brogile interpretation is deterministic.

however the initial position of the particle is not controllable by the experimenter...see below:In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes through exactly one of the slits. The final position of the particle on the detector screen and the slit through which the particle passes by is determined by the initial position of the particle. Such initial position is not controllable by the experimenter, so there is an appearance of randomness in the pattern of detection.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Goodison_Lad said:
According to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, is the universe, in its current state, the only one that could have evolved from its early conditions?

In other words, because in the theory, each particle actually possesses well-defined position/momentum/trajectory, does the theory imply that the universe we inhabit, to the very finest detail, is inevitable from the initial conditions?
Yes, that's correct.
 
  • #6
Thank you both.
 
  • #7
Yes I think what San K said regarding initial condition distributions is the key issue here. Once you have stipulated the values for initial dynamical variables, you get actual well defined trajectories (non classical though). There are no uncertainty relations that arise in an individual process once these conditions have been specified, no commutation relations. Because you are not interpreting the wave function statistically, the whole formalism of linear operators on Hilbert space becomes irrelevant; instead of solving for observables on hilbert space, you generally end up solving non linear differential equations.
In a sense uncertainty relations are only retrieved due to a chaotic distribution of initial conditions, similar in manner to how probability enters in statistical thermodynamics. So it's the probability of a particle "being" in a certain place and not simply of "finding" the particle at a certain place.
 

1. What is the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation?

The De Broglie-Bohm interpretation, also known as the pilot-wave theory, is an alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics that was proposed by Louis de Broglie and later developed by David Bohm. It suggests that particles have both a wave-like nature and a definite position, and that the wave function of a system guides the motion of particles.

2. How does the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation address the uncertainty principle?

The De Broglie-Bohm interpretation does not challenge the uncertainty principle, but rather offers a different way of understanding it. In this interpretation, the uncertainty in the position of a particle is due to our lack of knowledge about its initial conditions, rather than being an inherent property of the particle itself. This allows for a more deterministic view of quantum mechanics, in which the uncertainty arises from our limitations as observers rather than being a fundamental feature of the universe.

3. Can the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation be tested?

Yes, there have been several experiments that have been proposed to test the predictions of the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation. For example, the double-slit experiment can be modified to see if the predicted interference patterns match those observed in the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics. So far, these experiments have shown results consistent with the predictions of the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation.

4. What are some criticisms of the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation?

One criticism of the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation is that it requires the existence of a guiding wave, which is not directly observable and goes against the principle of Occam's razor. Another criticism is that it does not fully account for the phenomenon of quantum entanglement, which is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics. Additionally, the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation has not yet been fully developed and is still considered a minority view among scientists.

5. How does the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation relate to other interpretations of quantum mechanics?

The De Broglie-Bohm interpretation is just one of many interpretations of quantum mechanics, each with its own unique perspective on how to understand the fundamental nature of the universe. It is often compared and contrasted with other interpretations, such as the Copenhagen interpretation and the many-worlds interpretation. Ultimately, which interpretation one chooses to adopt is a matter of personal preference and philosophical beliefs, as all interpretations are currently able to explain and predict the same physical phenomena.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
846
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
11
Replies
376
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
808
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
305
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top