De Broglie-Bohm and the uncertainty principle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the De Broglie-Bohm theory regarding the evolution of the universe from its initial conditions. Participants explore whether the universe's current state is the only possible outcome given these conditions, focusing on concepts of determinism, free will, and the nature of unpredictability in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that according to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, the universe's current state is inevitable from its initial conditions, suggesting a deterministic framework.
  • Others argue that while the universe may be deterministic, it is not completely predictable due to the influence of measurement on initial conditions.
  • A participant questions whether a part of the universe without life would develop along the same lines as it has, suggesting that unpredictability may stem from limits on knowledge rather than intrinsic randomness.
  • Some participants highlight that the initial position of particles is not controllable by experimenters, leading to an appearance of randomness in outcomes despite the deterministic nature of the theory.
  • One participant notes that once initial conditions are specified, trajectories become well-defined, and uncertainty relations do not apply to individual processes, contrasting this with interpretations that involve statistical uncertainty.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of determinism and predictability in the De Broglie-Bohm theory. While some agree on the deterministic nature of the theory, others emphasize the role of measurement and initial conditions in introducing unpredictability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent of determinism and the nature of uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on interpretations of initial conditions and the unresolved nature of how unpredictability manifests in the context of the De Broglie-Bohm theory.

Goodison_Lad
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
According to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, is the universe, in its current state, the only one that could have evolved from its early conditions?

In other words, because in the theory, each particle actually possesses well-defined position/momentum/trajectory, does the theory imply that the universe we inhabit, to the very finest detail, is inevitable from the initial conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Goodison_Lad said:
According to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, is the universe, in its current state, the only one that could have evolved from its early conditions?

In other words, because in the theory, each particle actually possesses well-defined position/momentum/trajectory, does the theory imply that the universe we inhabit, to the very finest detail, is inevitable from the initial conditions?

yes Goodison_lad...Inevitable but not completely predictable...:) (or inevitable to the point where life evolved enough to have free will)

One of the reasons (that it cannot be totally predictable), and there are many more, would be that:

when measuring/determining the conditions (at any point in time) you effect the conditions so it can never be totally predictable

All this is, of course, per De Broglie-Bohm hypothesis/interpretation...

however I would say that there is (human and to a lesser extent animal) free will and that we can change the course (of our lives) to some extent...

Whether the universe is inherently random or totally "inevitable" is not of much use...in my opinion...it's what we do with it?...
 
Last edited:
Thanks, San K. I'd forgotten about the free will element (there's a bunch of threads in the Philosophy section where they're slugging that one out!) but if we accept its existence, I can see how my free choices in setting up an experiment in a particular way could affect the outcomes and set my corner of the universe on a different course.

So, assuming for the sake of argument, a part of the universe where no life has evolved, would that part of the universe develop inexorably along exactly the same lines as it already has? You hinted at other sources of unpredictability - but would these just represent a limit on our knowledge (according to De Broglie-Bohm) rather than some intrinsic 'anything could happen next' type of uncertainty, as present in other QM interpretetations?
 
Goodison_Lad said:
So, assuming for the sake of argument, a part of the universe where no life has evolved, would that part of the universe develop inexorably along exactly the same lines as it already has?

I think yes, like a balls on a billiard table...per De Broglie-Bohm hypothesis/assumption

The De Brogile interpretation is deterministic

and also, of course, the assumption that --- the experimental part of the universe is insulated from the rest of the universe for the duration of the experiment/observation

Goodison_Lad said:
You hinted at other sources of unpredictability - but would these just represent a limit on our knowledge (according to De Broglie-Bohm) rather than some intrinsic 'anything could happen next' type of uncertainty, as present in other QM interpretetations?

yes...per De Broglie-Bohm theory...the De Brogile interpretation is deterministic.

however the initial position of the particle is not controllable by the experimenter...see below:In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes through exactly one of the slits. The final position of the particle on the detector screen and the slit through which the particle passes by is determined by the initial position of the particle. Such initial position is not controllable by the experimenter, so there is an appearance of randomness in the pattern of detection.
 
Last edited:
Goodison_Lad said:
According to the De Broglie-Bohm theory, is the universe, in its current state, the only one that could have evolved from its early conditions?

In other words, because in the theory, each particle actually possesses well-defined position/momentum/trajectory, does the theory imply that the universe we inhabit, to the very finest detail, is inevitable from the initial conditions?
Yes, that's correct.
 
Thank you both.
 
Yes I think what San K said regarding initial condition distributions is the key issue here. Once you have stipulated the values for initial dynamical variables, you get actual well defined trajectories (non classical though). There are no uncertainty relations that arise in an individual process once these conditions have been specified, no commutation relations. Because you are not interpreting the wave function statistically, the whole formalism of linear operators on Hilbert space becomes irrelevant; instead of solving for observables on hilbert space, you generally end up solving non linear differential equations.
In a sense uncertainty relations are only retrieved due to a chaotic distribution of initial conditions, similar in manner to how probability enters in statistical thermodynamics. So it's the probability of a particle "being" in a certain place and not simply of "finding" the particle at a certain place.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
25K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K