A Decay Modes of J/psi: Understanding Gamma and Hadron Decays

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter nightvidcole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle decay
nightvidcole
Messages
23
Reaction score
12
TL;DR Summary
Is there always a unique signature of J/psi -----> g g g ?
Everywhere I look, I see the claim that J/psi decays to "g g g" about 64% of the time, and to "gamma -----> hadrons" about 13% of the time.

My question is, exactly how does one distinguish between (1) J/psi -----> g g g ------> hadrons, and (2) J/psi -----> gamma ------> hadrons?

If you observe J/psi -----> hadrons in the lab, is there never a case where this could be a result of either (or even quantum interference of the two)?

How does one interpret a decay like J/psi -----> p pbar as one or the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nightvidcole said:
TL;DR Summary: Is there always a unique signature of J/psi -----> g g g ?

My question is, exactly how does one distinguish between (1) J/psi -----> g g g ------> hadrons, and (2) J/psi -----> gamma ------> hadrons?
You can't. In QM you add amplitudes and then square. You can't tell from a final state what the intermediate state was (and the question doesn't even make sense).

What you can do is say that given that the branching fraction to electrons is 6%, and the branching fraction to muons is 6%, if decays to quarks were purely electromagnetic, that would be 3(4/9 + 1/9 + 1/9) x 6% = 12%, so the remainder is gluon-induced. Maybe not strictly true, but it give you an idea of the relative magnitudes.
 
nightvidcole said:
TL;DR Summary: Is there always a unique signature of J/psi -----> g g g ?

How does one interpret a decay like J/psi -----> p pbar as one or the other?
That decay is almost purely QCD.

B(J/\psi \rightarrow p\overline{p})<br /> \approx B(J/\psi \rightarrow n\overline{n} )

You would expect the proton channel to dominate if the decay were primarily electromagnetic.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top