Deceptive Japanese Whaling Season Begins

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mugaliens
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the controversial practices of Japanese whaling, particularly the justification of these activities as "scientific research." Participants express strong opinions on the ethics of whaling, the implications of deception in these practices, and the broader environmental and conservation issues related to whale populations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the Japanese whaling activities are deceptive and morally reprehensible, framing them as an affront to global ethics.
  • Others question the media portrayal of whaling compared to fishing, suggesting that the emotional appeal of whales as mammals influences public perception.
  • There is a discussion about the sustainability of whaling practices, with some asserting that as long as it is sustainable, it should be permissible.
  • Participants highlight the endangered status of certain whale species targeted by Japanese whalers, raising concerns about the implications of such hunting.
  • Some express skepticism about the effectiveness of farming whales as a solution, while others believe that capturing from the wild is a legitimate source of food and income.
  • Several participants reference the documentary "The Cove" to illustrate the severity of whaling practices and their impact on marine life.
  • There is a debate about the practicality of wild capture versus farming, with some suggesting that current demands exceed sustainable practices.
  • One participant challenges the notion that whales are being hunted to extinction, suggesting that the current Japanese hunt does not threaten their survival.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the ethics of whaling, the effectiveness of current regulations, or the sustainability of hunting practices. Disagreements persist regarding the justification of whaling under the guise of scientific research and the emotional versus factual basis for opposition to whaling.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various sources and opinions, indicating a complex interplay of ethical, environmental, and economic considerations. The discussion reflects differing perspectives on the definitions of sustainability and the implications of hunting practices on endangered species.

  • #151
nismaratwork said:
You're not Japanese? What a pity. I asked if you were Japanese, then I called you a word that's difficult to translate, but "Person who shows moral cowardice" would be an accurate translation.

Thanks for spelling me off Mech, he can turn his guns on you for a while. :biggrin:


And I think it's safe to say the signal to noise ratio of this thread is approaching zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #152
DaveC426913 said:
Thanks for spelling me off Mech, he can turn his guns on you for a while. :biggrin:


And I think it's safe to say the signal to noise ratio of this thread is approaching zero.

My pleasure, when I was a boy I did a lot of babysitting, and I agree with your latter statement as well.
 
  • #153
Thread bedtime.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K