Decoding the Notation: Understanding B Meson Decay Amplitude in Particle Physics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter liealgebra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Decay Mesons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on interpreting the notation used in particle physics, specifically regarding the decay amplitude of B mesons, represented as b→sγ. The matrix element ⟨ B_p|b^† b|B_p ⟩ is highlighted, where p denotes the u or d quark labels, and b, b† are the creation and annihilation operators. Participants clarify that the amplitude for a transition from an initial to a final state is indeed expressed as ⟨ \mbox{final}|\hat{O}|\mbox{initial} ⟩, raising questions about the context and definitions of the variables involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of B meson decay processes
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory notation
  • Knowledge of creation and annihilation operators
  • Basic principles of matrix elements in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of B meson decay amplitudes in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the role of matrix elements in particle interactions
  • Explore the significance of creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the context of specific decay processes like b→sγ in particle physics literature
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on B meson decay and quantum field theory will benefit from this discussion.

liealgebra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This question is mostly about how to interpret notation used in Particle Physics. At lowest order the rate of [itex]b\rightarrow s\gamma[/itex] is proportional to

[itex]\langle B_p|b^\dagger b|B_p\rangle[/itex] where p is either u or d labels and b, b+ are creation annhilation operators. However, I am unable to understand this notation. For some initial state transforming to a final state isn't the amplitude given by [itex]\langle \mbox{final}|\hat{O}|\mbox{initial}\rangle[/itex]. Shouldn't the amplitude be in this case [itex]\langle s\gamma|b^\dagger b|b\rangle[/itex] or something?

So what does the provided matrix element mean, exactly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you read this? It may be understandable if given the context, like how these variables are defined.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K