Graduate Define spin operators for numerical groundstate obtained by ED

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring spin components of ground states obtained through exact diagonalization (ED). The challenge arises from the representation of these states, which are now vectors with double components rather than integers. The user seeks to define spin operators that can be integrated into their code for accurate measurement. They have attempted to use correlation functions and partition sums but are looking for further suggestions. Ultimately, the user reports that they have found a solution to their problem.
woodydewer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The ground state obtained by ED is not in a suitable representation and I am looking for a way to define spin operators working with that.
Hi,
I want to measure spin components of a ground state of some models. These ground states are obtained by ED. The states for constructing the Hamiltonian are integers representing spins in binary. As the ground state (and the other eigenvectors) are now not anymore in a suitable representation (just vectors with doubles as components instead of integers), I am looking for a way to define my spin operators to measure the components suitable for my code.

I tried rewriting as Correlation function or with the partition sum. Do you have any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

It's possible that your post may get a good answer. What you are asking, however, may not be clear to anyone who does not already know precisely what you are trying to do.
 
Hi, I could solve it. :)
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 388 ·
13
Replies
388
Views
176K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K