Definite Integral: x(-ln(x)^k)(1-x)^(N-1)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral \(\int_{0}^{1}x(-\ln(x))^{k}(1-x)^{(N-1)}dx\) cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. The solution is derived using Maxima, resulting in \((-1)^k\left( \left. \frac{{d}^{k}}{d\,{x}^{k}}\,\beta\left(N,x\right) \right|_{x=2}\right)\), where \(\beta\) is the Beta function. The discussion also touches on the use of induction for solving integrals structured like the Beta function and highlights the Gamma function's role in the evaluation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Beta function and its applications
  • Knowledge of the Gamma function and its integral representation
  • Experience with symbolic computation tools like Maxima
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties and applications of the Beta function in calculus
  • Learn how to use Maxima for symbolic integration
  • Study the relationship between the Gamma function and Beta function
  • Investigate induction methods for solving complex integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in advanced integral evaluation techniques.

bincy
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Dear All,[math] \int_{0}^{1}x*\left(\left(-ln(x)\right)^{k}\right)*\left(1-x\right)^{(N-1)}dx [/math], where k is an odd no. N >=2.regards,
Bincy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bincybn said:
Dear All,[math] \int_{0}^{1}x*\left(\left(-ln(x)\right)^{k}\right)*\left(1-x\right)^{(N-1)}dx [/math], where k is an odd no. N >=2.

regards,
Bincy
Hi bincybn,

Your integral cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. However using Maxima I found that the answer is,

\[\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1}x((-ln(x))^{k}\left(1-x\right)^{(N-1)}dx=(-1)^k\left( \left. \frac{{d}^{k}}{d\,{x}^{k}}\,\beta\left(N,x\right) \right|_{x=2}\right)~~~~\mbox{for }k\in\mathbb{Z^+}\]

\(\beta\) is the Beta function.
 
Sudharaka said:
Hi bincybn,

Your integral cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions. However using Maxima I found that the answer is,

\[\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1}x((-ln(x))^{k}\left(1-x\right)^{(N-1)}dx=(-1)^k\left( \left. \frac{{d}^{k}}{d\,{x}^{k}}\,\beta\left(N,x\right) \right|_{x=2}\right)~~~~\mbox{for }k\in\mathbb{Z^+}\]

\(\beta\) is the Beta function.

Since the integral is set up like the beta function, maybe he was supposed to obtain the solution by induction.
 
dwsmith said:
Since the integral is set up like the beta function, maybe he was supposed to obtain the solution by induction.

Hi dwsmith, (Wave)

Yes, maybe. But without knowing the answer it is impossible to use the induction method. Isn't?
 
Gamma function \Gamma (z) = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-t} t^{z-1} dt

\int_{0}^{1} x((- \ln x )^k) (1-x)^{n-1} dx

Let u = - \ln x \Rightarrow x = e^{-u} \Rightarrow dx = - e^{-u} du

x = 0 \rightarrow u = \infty , x = 1 \rightarrow u = 0

\int_{\infty}^{0} e^{-u} (u^k )(1-e^{-u})^n(-e^{-u}) du

\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-2u} (u^k )(1-e^{-u})^n du

Note that
(1-e^{-u})^n = \sum_{i=0}^{n} \dbinom{n}{i} (-1)^i (e^{-u})^i

and \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-at} t^{z-1} dt = \frac{\Gamma (z)}{a}

\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-2u} (u^k )(1-e^{-u})^n du = \sum_{i=0}^{n} (-1)^i \int_{0}^{\infty} (u^k)(e^{-u(2+i)}) du

\sum_{i=0}^{n} (-1)^i \int_{0}^{\infty} (u^k)(e^{-u(2+i)}) du =<br /> \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^i\Gamma (k+1)}{2+i}

I solved it for n instead of n-1
 
Last edited:
Thanks everyone.

To Amer: Thanks for ur method. But some mistakes are here and there like.
Amer said:
\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-at} t^{z-1} dt = \frac{\Gamma (z)}{a}

which is in fact \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-at} t^{z-1} dt = \frac{\Gamma (z)}{a^z}regards,
Bincy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K