Definition of Expectation Value (EV)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expected value Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The expectation value (EV) is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics and statistics, defined for both discrete and continuous probability distributions. For discrete cases, the expectation value is calculated using the formula = ∑_n Q_n p_n, where Q_n represents the eigenvalue and p_n the probability of measuring the system in that state. In continuous distributions, the expectation value is expressed as = ∫_All space ψ*(x)Q(x)ψ(x) dx, utilizing the normalized wave function ψ(x). This discussion provides essential equations and examples, including the expectation value of rolling a die and calculating position and momentum in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with probability theory
  • Knowledge of discrete and continuous probability distributions
  • Basic calculus for integration and summation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about variance and its calculation in both discrete and continuous cases
  • Explore the significance of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the applications of expectation values in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, statisticians, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of probability theory.

Messages
19,910
Reaction score
10,919
Definition/Summary

A short introduction to expectation value is given, both for discrete and continuous cases.

Equations

For discrete probability distributions,

<Q> \ = \ \sum _n Q_n p_n

For continuous distributions specified by a normalized, real space wave-function \psi(x),

< Q > = \int _{\text{All space}} \psi^*(x)Q(x)\psi(x) dx

Extended explanation

NOTATION:

The notation < > comes from statistics, so it is a general notation which QM scientists borrowed.


DEFINITIONS:

The expectation value of an observable associated with an operator Q is defined as:

&lt;Q&gt; = \sum _n Q_n p_n

in the case of a discrete spectrum, where Q_n is the eigenvalue of Q for a state labeled by the index n, and p_n is the probability of measuring the system in this state.


DISCRETE DISTRIBUTIONS:

Variance in statistics, discrete case:
(\Delta A ) ^2 = \sum _n (A_n - &lt;A&gt;)^2 p_n ,
\sum _n p_n = 1 ,
&lt;A&gt; = \sum _n A_nP_n ,
&lt;&lt;A&gt;&gt; = &lt;A&gt;
&lt;A&gt; is just a number, we can thus show that:
(\Delta A ) ^2 = &lt;A^2&gt; + &lt;A&gt;^2
and
&lt;(\Delta A ) ^2&gt; = (\Delta A ) ^2. as an exercise, show this.

where \sum _n p_n = 1 and A_n is the outcome of the n'th value.


EXAMPLE:

As an exercise, let's find the expectation value <D>, of the outcome of rolling dice:

&lt;D&gt; = 1 \cdot \dfrac{1}{6} + 2 \cdot \dfrac{1}{6} + 3 \cdot \dfrac{1}{6} + 4 \cdot \dfrac{1}{6} + 5 \cdot \dfrac{1}{6} + 5 \cdot \dfrac{1}{6} = \dfrac{7}{2}
since each value has the equal probability of 1/6 .


CONTINUOUS DISTRIBUTIONS:

Now this was for the discrete case, in the continuous case:
&lt; Q &gt; = \int _{\text{All space}} f(x)Q(x)f(x) dx
where f^2(x) is the probability density distribution : \int f^2(x) dx = 1.

That was if the probability density distribution is real, for complex valued (such as quantum mechanical wave functions):
&lt; Q &gt; = \int _{\text{All space}} \psi^*(x)Q(x)\psi(x) dx
\int |\psi (x)|^2 dx = 1.

EXAMPLES:

Position:
&lt; x &gt; = \int _{\text{All space}} \psi^*(x)x\psi(x) dx = \int x|\psi (x)|^2 dx

Momentum:
&lt; p &gt; = \int _{\text{All space}} \psi^*(x)(-i\hbar\dfrac{d}{dx})\psi(x) dx

Now the variance is:
\Delta Q ^2 = &lt;(Q - &lt;Q&gt;)^2&gt; = &lt;Q^2&gt; - &lt;Q&gt;^2

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In QM, we write expectation value rather than expected value. The former sounds better as almost every textbook uses that term. Secondly, while writing bra-ket notation in the future insight article, it would be better if \langle and \rangle are used rather than < and >.

(You can delete this post once you make the necessary changes, as this would then become useless.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K