Definition of Strong and Weak form of a theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A theorem is considered a strong form if it implies a weaker form, meaning that the strong form has more hypotheses and proves a more robust result. Conversely, a weak form implies a strong form when fewer hypotheses are required to achieve the same conclusion. An example of equivalence exists between induction and strong induction, illustrating that terminology can sometimes obscure the underlying mathematical relationships. The distinction between strengthening and weakening a theorem lies in the ability to drop or replace hypotheses while maintaining the same result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical theorems and their implications
  • Familiarity with logical implications in mathematics
  • Knowledge of induction and strong induction principles
  • Basic concepts of hypothesis in theorem formulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of mathematical theorems in formal logic
  • Study the principles of induction and strong induction in detail
  • Explore examples of strong and weak forms of theorems in various mathematical fields
  • Investigate the role of hypotheses in theorem strength and generality
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students seeking clarity on the distinctions between strong and weak forms of theorems, as well as those interested in the implications of hypotheses in mathematical proofs.

JFo
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Could someone explain to me what it means for a theorem to be a strong(er) form or a weak(er) form of another theorem?

I've heard these terms used over and over, but never bothered to ask. If I had to guess at a definition, I'd say that if q is a theorem then we say p is stronger if p implies q. Similarly p is weaker if q implies p. Am I close?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes. Generally - aren't there always exceptions in mathematics.

As a general rule the strong version will need more hypotheses than the weak version, but correspondingly prove a result that is stronger (and implies the weaker version).

This is not always the case, as there is at least on situation where the strong and weak version actually are equivalent: induction and strong induction are the same, but phrased differently so that one seems like a stronger (more powerful) result.
 
Thanks. I know it's mostly semantics, but I couldn't find a definition, or even a description, anywhere.
 
So if we have a theorem, and are then able to show that we can drop one of the hypotheses (or replace it with a weaker hypothesis) and still obtain the same result, would that be considered "strengthening" or "weakening"

Intuitively I would think strengthening, but then I don't know how that fits in with the quasi-definition given above since we have less hypotheses but the result remains unchanged. Or is this a different meaning of strong/weak entirely?
 
JFo said:
So if we have a theorem, and are then able to show that we can drop one of the hypotheses (or replace it with a weaker hypothesis) and still obtain the same result, would that be considered "strengthening" or "weakening"

Intuitively I would think strengthening, but then I don't know how that fits in with the quasi-definition given above since we have less hypotheses but the result remains unchanged. Or is this a different meaning of strong/weak entirely?

The theorem that assumes less in the hypothesis is "stronger" or "more general". I wouldn't worry too much about what these terms exactly mean though, since they don't carry much information.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K