Definition of the limit of a sequence

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of the limit of a sequence, particularly focusing on the implications of using different forms of the ε (epsilon) notation in mathematical definitions. Participants explore the standard definition and propose variations, questioning the necessity and clarity of these definitions in the context of teaching and understanding limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants present the standard definition of a limit of a sequence using ε and question whether it can be generalized to |un - l| < kε for some constant k.
  • Others argue that there is no mathematical difference between ε and kε, suggesting that complicating the definition is unnecessary.
  • Some participants express that using a form like |un - l| ≤ kε could be beneficial, especially in mathematical proofs where such flexibility is often encountered.
  • A few participants mention that the strict inequality (<) in the definition is important for distinguishing between open and closed neighborhoods, raising concerns about potential confusion in teaching.
  • There are discussions about the logical reasoning involved in understanding limits, including the negation of limits and how to express that a sequence does not converge to a limit.
  • One participant shares their experience of learning analysis and how they found the transition from ε to ε' in proofs to be challenging yet ultimately valuable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the proposed variations of the limit definition are necessary or beneficial. There are competing views on the clarity and utility of using kε versus ε, as well as differing opinions on the implications of using strict versus non-strict inequalities.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the complexity of limits often arises when ε is not small, and that the choice between using < or ≤ can affect understanding. There is also mention of how the definition's structure might influence later concepts in analysis.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and educators in mathematics, particularly those involved in learning or teaching analysis and the concept of limits in sequences.

  • #31
Definitions written in symbols:

Given a sequence xn, we say that x is a cluster point for xn if (\forall \epsilon &gt;0)(\forall N)(\exists n&gt;N)(\vert x-x_{n} \vert &lt;\epsilon).

Given a sequence xn, we say that xn converges to x if (\forall \epsilon &gt;0)(\exists N)(\forall n&gt;N)(\vert x-x_{n} \vert &lt;\epsilon).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K