Why is it that, in the definition of the path integral, we have the(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); of neighboring integrals of the form : ∫Φdxproduct_{1}.....dx_{n}when the whole idea is based on adding the contribution of neighboring paths. I need some help understanding why it is of the form ∫Φdx_{1}.....dx_{n}and not the form ∫Φdx_{1}+∫Φdx_{2}+...∫Φdx_{n}where Φ is e^{iS/ħ}. I hope I'm making sense. In the formulation of the idea, we have discrete points in time where we sum over all values of x at that point, namely ∫Φdx_{i}and we add each contribution in the discrete limit Σ∫Φdx_{i}. Why is it that this turns into a chain of differentials dx_{i}in the limit that the length of the time intervals goes to 0 and the number of intervals goes to infinity? Again, I hope this makes sense and that you can shed some light on this for me.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Definition of the Path Integral

Loading...

Similar Threads - Definition Path Integral | Date |
---|---|

I Wave Functions of Definite Momentum | Oct 30, 2017 |

B Simple definition of spin? | Sep 13, 2016 |

Does electron has definite path? | Nov 4, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**