Definition of the residual spectrum

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Spectrum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The residual spectrum \(\sigma_r(A)\) of a bounded operator \(A\) on a Hilbert space \(H\) consists of those \(\lambda\) for which \(\lambda - A\) is injective and does not have a dense range. The condition that \(\lambda\) is not an eigenvalue is equivalent to \(\lambda - A\) being injective, but this alone does not define the residual spectrum. The spectrum is categorized into three parts: the point spectrum (eigenvalues), the continuous spectrum (injective with dense range), and the residual spectrum (injective without dense range).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bounded operators in functional analysis
  • Familiarity with Hilbert spaces
  • Knowledge of spectrum types in operator theory
  • Concept of injectivity and dense ranges in linear operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bounded operators on Hilbert spaces
  • Learn about the classification of spectra in operator theory
  • Explore the implications of injectivity and dense ranges in functional analysis
  • Investigate examples of operators with residual spectra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in functional analysis, as well as graduate students studying operator theory and spectral theory.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
If [itex]A[/itex] is a bounded operator on a Hilbert space [itex]H[/itex], isn't the following true of the residual spectrum [itex]\sigma_r(A)[/itex]:

[itex]\lambda \in \sigma_r(A)[/itex] iff [itex](\forall \psi \in H, \psi \neq 0)((\lambda - A) \psi \neq 0)[/itex] iff [itex]\ker (\lambda - A) = \{0\}[/itex] iff [itex]\lambda - A[/itex] is injective?

So isn't the condition that [itex]\lambda[/itex] isn't an eigenvalue equivalent to the condition [itex]\lambda - A[/itex] is injective?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AxiomOfChoice said:
If [itex]A[/itex] is a bounded operator on a Hilbert space [itex]H[/itex], isn't the following true of the residual spectrum [itex]\sigma_r(A)[/itex]:

[itex]\lambda \in \sigma_r(A)[/itex] iff [itex](\forall \psi \in H, \psi \neq 0)((\lambda - A) \psi \neq 0)[/itex] iff [itex]\ker (\lambda - A) = \{0\}[/itex] iff [itex]\lambda - A[/itex] is injective?

No, [itex]\lambda[/itex] is in the residual spectrum if [itex]\lambda-A[/itex] is injective AND does not have dense range. You're missing here that [itex]\lambda-A[/itex] can not have dense range.

So isn't the condition that [itex]\lambda[/itex] isn't an eigenvalue equivalent to the condition [itex]\lambda - A[/itex] is injective?

This is true.

It seems you're mistaking the residual spectrum for the part of the spectrum which are not eigenvalues. This is not true. The spectrum can be divided in 3 parts:

- The point spectrum: all the eigenvalues
- The continuous spectrum: These are the [itex]\lambda[/itex] such that [itex]\lambda - A[/itex] is injective and has dense range.
- The residual spectrum:These are the [itex]\lambda[/itex] such that [itex]\lambda - A[/itex] is injective and does not have dense range.

So the elements which are not eigenvalues are either contained in the continuous or the residual spectrum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K