Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Deflection of beam

  1. Nov 19, 2011 #1
    I have some questions about calculating the deflection of beam.
    First, when should I applied the method of superposition ?
    Second, When I'm setting a "x" on the beam, where should I start and end ?

    Thank you for answering!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 19, 2011 #2

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    1. Whenever it is necessary.
    2. Start at the beginning and go to the end.

    Your questions are overly vague, as are my answers. If you have a specific example to discuss, then you will get more usable responses.
     
  4. Nov 19, 2011 #3
    [​IMG]

    for question like above, is superposition necessary?
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2011
  5. Nov 19, 2011 #4

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    It's not necessary to use superposition. If you had a table of beam deflections and slopes for a cantilever loaded from A to B with a UDL and from A to C with a UDL, you could use superposition to find the slope and deflection for the problem shown. If you are going to work out the slope and deflection using, say, the integration method, superposition would not be as useful.
     
  6. Nov 19, 2011 #5

    nvn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    mchei: In response to your two questions in post 1 ...
    (1) Superposition is used when a more difficult linear problem can be broken into two (or more) simpler problems.

    (2) I usually like to start x at the beam left-hand end, and end x at the right-hand end.​
    Superposition might be necessary in a question such as in post 3.
     
  7. Nov 22, 2011 #6
    @ NVM

    Couldn't you create an equivalent loading configuration to make the math easier and not have to deal with superposition at all?
     
  8. Nov 23, 2011 #7

    nvn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    aeb2335: No, I currently think an "equivalent" loading is generally not equivalent.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Deflection of beam
  1. Deflection of beams (Replies: 2)

  2. Beam deflection (Replies: 3)

  3. Beam Deflection (Replies: 4)

Loading...