Degeneracy of the 3d harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the degeneracy of states in a 3D harmonic oscillator, focusing on the eigenvalues and the corresponding quantum numbers. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and implications of degeneracy in this quantum system.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially presents the eigenvalue formula En = (N + 3/2) hw and seeks assistance with degeneracy calculations.
  • Another participant questions the form of the "N" operator, suggesting it may be a^\dagger a.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the correct formula for energy levels, with n defined as the sum of three quantum numbers (n_x, n_y, n_z).
  • One participant claims that for the nth energy level, the degeneracy is 3n, while another later proposes a different formula, g(n) = (1/2)(n+1)(n+2), challenging the initial claim.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the proposed formulas, with one participant noting potential accidental degeneracies that may not fit the pattern.
  • Participants engage in deriving the formula for degeneracy, with one expressing confusion over the steps and the correctness of the derivation.
  • A later reply confirms that the formula works for specific cases, such as n=10, providing detailed examples of states and their corresponding degeneracies.
  • One participant acknowledges a previous oversight in their calculations and thanks another for the correction.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for information regarding the infinite cubic well and mentions challenges related to accidental degeneracies in that context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the correct formula for degeneracy, with multiple competing views presented. The discussion remains unresolved on certain aspects, particularly concerning accidental degeneracies and the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the derivation steps and the applicability of the formulas for higher energy levels, indicating potential limitations in their understanding or the completeness of the formulas presented.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying harmonic oscillators and degeneracy in quantum systems, may find this discussion beneficial.

mavyn
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm trying to calculate the degeneracy of each state for 3D harmonic oscillator.
The eigenvalues are

En = (N + 3/2) hw

Unfortunately I didn't find this topic in my textbook.
Can somebody help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does the "N" operator look like? Is it just a^\dagger a or something else?
 
StatMechGuy said:
What does the "N" operator look like? Is it just a^\dagger a or something else?

Hi,
sorry I made a mistake in the formula. It should be

En = (n + 3/2) hw
 
n is the sum of 3 quantum numbers, n_x, n_y, n_z; for the lowest rung, which is n=0, there's no degeneracy. For n=1, there's 3 fold degeneracy (one of the quantum numbers is 1, and rest is 0). For n=2, there's 6 fold degenertacy (one of them may be 2 and rest 0, or two of them may be 1) and so on. The result is, for nth energy level, there's 3n degeneracy.
 
gulsen said:
n is the sum of 3 quantum numbers, n_x, n_y, n_z; for the lowest rung, which is n=0, there's no degeneracy. For n=1, there's 3 fold degeneracy (one of the quantum numbers is 1, and rest is 0). For n=2, there's 6 fold degenertacy (one of them may be 2 and rest 0, or two of them may be 1) and so on. The result is, for nth energy level, there's 3n degeneracy.

Thanks for the answer!
 
Watch out!

No that's not right.
You can't work it out for the first couple of cases and then presume the trend continues like that.
In fact, the degeneracy g(n) is:
g(n) = (1/2)(n+1)(n+2)
 
014137 said:
No that's not right.
You can't work it out for the first couple of cases and then presume the trend continues like that.
In fact, the degeneracy g(n) is:
g(n) = (1/2)(n+1)(n+2)

And even this, I think, is nt completely right. There are some levels with additional accidental degeneracy which don't fit the pattern.
 
Really? Which ones?
The formula can be derived like this:
n = n1 + n2 + n3
where 1,2,3 are three orthogonal directions.
Choose n1 then
n2 + n3 = n - n1
Can always pick n - n1 + 1 different pairs of n2, n3.
Sum over n1 from 0 to n:

Sum(n - n1 +1) = Sum(n - 1) - Sum(n1)
=(n - 1)*(n - 1) - (1/2)n(n + 1)
=(1/2)(n+1)(n+2)

Maybe there's a mistake somewhere?
 
014137 said:
Really? Which ones?
The formula can be derived like this:
n = n1 + n2 + n3
where 1,2,3 are three orthogonal directions.
Choose n1 then
n2 + n3 = n - n1
Can always pick n - n1 + 1 different pairs of n2, n3.
Sum over n1 from 0 to n:

Sum(n - n1 +1) = Sum(n - 1) - Sum(n1)
=(n - 1)*(n - 1) - (1/2)n(n + 1)
=(1/2)(n+1)(n+2)

Maybe there's a mistake somewhere?
I was thinking about the cubic infinite square well which is more tricky since it involves the sum of squares, so never mind my comment about accidental degeneracy.

Your formula may be right but I don't understand how you got from (n - 1)*(n - 1) - (1/2)n(n + 1) to (1/2)(n+1)(n+2). Those two expressions are not equal. Moreover, the sum \sum_{n_1 = 0}^n gives (n+1), not (n-1), right?

EDIT: Actually, the formula does not seem to work. I may have missed some states, but I can't get it to work for n=10, say.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
sorry - i was being silly
Sum(n - n1 +1) = Sum(n + 1) - Sum(n1)
=(n + 1)*(n + 1) - (1/2)n(n + 1)
=(1/2)(n+1)(n+2)
 
  • #11
Does work for n = 10, look:
State
3 x 10, 0, 0
3 x 8, 1, 1
3 x 6, 2, 2
3 x 4, 3, 3
3 x 2, 4, 4
3 x 0, 5, 5
6 x 9, 1, 0
6 x 8, 2, 0
6 x 7, 3, 0
6 x 7, 2, 1
6 x 6, 4, 0
6 x 6, 3, 1
6 x 5, 4, 1
6 x 5, 3, 2
Degeneracy = 6 x 8 + 3 x 6 = 6 x 11 = 66

The formula for g(n) gives (1/2)*(11)*(12) = 66

So it works.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
014137 said:
Does work for n = 10, look:
State
3 x 10, 0, 0
3 x 8, 1, 1
3 x 6, 2, 2
3 x 4, 3, 3
3 x 2, 4, 4
3 x 0, 5, 5
6 x 9, 1, 0
6 x 8, 2, 0
6 x 7, 3, 0
6 x 7, 2, 1
6 x 6, 4, 0
6 x 6, 3, 1
6 x 5, 4, 1
6 x 5, 3, 2
Degeneracy = 6 x 8 + 3 x 6 = 6 x 11 = 66

The formula for g(n) gives (1/2)*(11)*(12) = 66

So it works.


Yes, you are completely right. I had missed one entry.
Good job. Thanks for the correction.

If you know a formula for the infinite cubic well, let me know...It's in that case that accidental degeneracy are a killer.

Regards

Patrick
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frank Schroer
  • #13
Thank you everyone.. i too was stuck in it and it helped me a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K