I Degrees of freedom and constraints

AI Thread Summary
In systems with P holonomic constraints and N particles, there are 3N-P degrees of freedom, requiring 3N-P generalized coordinates for independent variation. For non-holonomic constraints, despite needing 3N coordinates to fully describe the system, these coordinates do not vary independently due to the constraints imposed. Non-holonomic constraints necessitate more coordinates than degrees of freedom, as they must adhere to specific relationships. The handling of non-holonomic constraints remains an active area of research, with ongoing developments in the field. For further insights, references such as "Flannery nonholonomic" can provide additional information.
Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
In case of P holonomic constraints and N particles, I have 3N-P degrees of freedom and I have to look for 3N-P generalized coordinates if I want them to vary independently, but what about non-holonomic constraints? I know if I have N particles and P non-holonomic constraints, I still need 3N coordinates to completely describe the mechanical system, but do those 3N coordinates vary independently?(assume I'm talking about any set of coordinates, not just cartesian)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In systems with non-holonomic constraints, we always need more coordinates than degrees of freedom. Of course, those coordinates do not vary independently, they have to obey the non-holonomic constraint.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Ahmed1029
FYI: the handling of non-holonomic constraints is still an active research area. Google for "Flannery nonholonomic" to see some relevant references.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, andresB and Ahmed1029
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top