How Many Degrees of Freedom Does an Object in 3D Space Have?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In three-dimensional space, an object possesses six degrees of freedom (6DoF), which include three translational movements along the x, y, and z axes, and three rotational movements about these axes. This definition is crucial for understanding the motion of rigid bodies, as it encompasses both position and orientation changes. The degrees of freedom are determined by the constraints applied to the system, with the formal definition stating that the number of degrees of freedom equals 3N - n, where N is the number of mass points and n is the number of constraints. Understanding these concepts is essential for fields such as physics and engineering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rigid body dynamics
  • Familiarity with translational and rotational motion
  • Basic knowledge of constraints in mechanical systems
  • Mathematical proficiency in vector spaces and dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of constraints on degrees of freedom in mechanical systems
  • Study the mathematical formulation of degrees of freedom in multi-body dynamics
  • Explore applications of 6DoF in robotics and simulation environments
  • Learn about the role of degrees of freedom in control systems design
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, engineers, robotics developers, and anyone involved in the study of motion dynamics and mechanical systems.

e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
I see a lot of ambiguous explanations of degrees of freedom on the web and I need clarification. Suppose there is an object in space that can move freely along either the x,y, or z axis. Do we say it has six degrees of freedom because it can move along the x-axis one way or the opposite way, and one way or the other way on the y-axis and one way or the other way on the z axis or do we just say it has 3 degrees of freedom relating to the number of axes of motion?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A zero of an axis is a pretty arbitrary choice -- so in that respect: three. However, depending on the context, six might also be a good choice (three position components, three velocity components -- and then higher order derivatives are taken care of by equations of motion).

All this for a pointlike object. For an extended object there are some more degrees of freedom (rotational).

[edit] "depending on the context" should be explained. For the physics I bow to @wrobel below. My DOF habitat is in equation solving -- xqq for possible confusion...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SchroedingersLion
Intuitively, the degrees of freedom describe the fundamental independent ways a particle can move. All movements are superpositions of such fundamental movements.
E.g. in two dimensions, there might be two degrees of freedom, one for the x-, one for the y- direction. All other directions are superpositions of these two basic movements.
However, if you consider a pendulum in two dimensions, the same is not true. The pendulum can move in x- and in y- direction, but not independently (the x-position already defines the respective y-position). Thus, there is just one degree of freedom for the pendulum: Either the x- or the y- direction (or more conveniently the angle). That means the amount of degrees of freedom depends on the situation at hand.
 
Degrees of freedom never characterize velocities in a system. They characterize set of possible positions of the system. Formal definition is as follows. Let a system consists of ##N## mass points with radius-vectors ##\boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol r_N##. Assume that this system is subordinated to the following constraints
$$\sum_{i=1}^N\Big(\boldsymbol a_{ij}(t,\boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol r_N),\boldsymbol{\dot r}_i\Big)+b_j(t,\boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol r_N)=0,\quad j=1,\ldots, n<3N.$$
The vectors ##\xi_j=(\boldsymbol a_{1j},\ldots, \boldsymbol a_{Nj})\in \mathbb{R}^{3N}## are linearly independent.
If the constraints are holonomic: ##f_j(t,\boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol r_N)=0## then this case is reduced to the previous one by differentiation in ##t##:
$$\sum_{i=1}^N\Big(\frac{\partial f_j}{\partial \boldsymbol r_i},\boldsymbol{\dot r}_i\Big)+\frac{\partial f_j}{\partial t}=0.$$

By definition, the vector space of virtual displacements consists of vectors ##(\delta \boldsymbol r_1,\ldots,\delta\boldsymbol r_N)\in\mathbb{R}^{3N}## such that
$$\sum_{i=1}^N\Big(\boldsymbol a_{ij},\delta\boldsymbol r_i\Big)=0.$$

By definition the number of degrees of freedom equals dimension of the space of virtual displacements. It is easy to see that the number of degrees of freedom is equal to ##3N-n##
 
Thanks for the responses. There is much to ponder.
 
I'm a little surprised no one stated it specifically, but the reason objects in 3-dimensional space have 6 degrees of freedom is because there are 3 translational (e.g. X, Y, Z) and 3 rotational (e.g. Rot_X, Rot_Y, and Rot_Z) degrees of freedom. A rigid unconstrained part can translate along any axis, and also rotate about any axis.

More reading here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_degrees_of_freedom

Wikipedia.org said:
Six degrees of freedom (6DoF) refers to the freedom of movement of a rigid body in three-dimensional space. Specifically, the body is free to change position as forward/backward (surge), up/down (heave), left/right (sway) translation in three perpendicular axes, combined with changes in orientation through rotation about three perpendicular axes, often termed yaw (normal axis), pitch (transverse axis), and roll (longitudinal axis).
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K