Delaying Autoignition: 10:1 Air-Petrol Mix at 20°C

  • Thread starter Thread starter daveyjones97
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of delaying the autoignition of a petrol-air mixture with a 10:1 air to petrol ratio at a temperature of 20°C during compression. Participants explore the implications of heat management, compression ratios, and potential applications in engine design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that preventing heat buildup during compression could allow for higher pressures without autoignition.
  • Others argue that the time frame of a compression cycle may not allow for significant heat extraction from the mixture.
  • One participant mentions that diesel engines rely on autoignition and that older models struggled in cold weather due to insufficient heat during compression.
  • There is a proposal that using water vapor injection could help cool the intake air, potentially delaying autoignition.
  • Another participant discusses the feasibility of designing an engine to operate at very low revolutions per minute (RPM) to facilitate heat removal.
  • Some participants highlight the importance of the stoichiometric ratio for combustion efficiency and the factors influencing autoignition, including temperature and pressure.
  • One participant shares an idea about using compressed air energy storage to enhance engine performance, drawing parallels to nitrous oxide systems.
  • Another participant elaborates on the concept of using a high-pressure air tank to provide cooling and boost pressure, discussing potential design considerations and challenges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of viewpoints, with no clear consensus on the feasibility of delaying autoignition through heat management strategies. Multiple competing ideas and hypotheses are presented, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various factors that influence autoignition, including the compression cycle duration, the stoichiometric ratio, and the physical properties of the air-fuel mixture. There are also discussions about the practical implications of proposed solutions, such as weight and power requirements for engine modifications.

daveyjones97
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
can you delay autoignition of petrol air mixture by preventing it from heating above 20 degree celsius as its compressed. how high pressure could be reached before autoignition? assume 10 to 1 (10:1) air to petrol mix.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


daveyjones97 said:
can you delay autoignition of petrol air mixture by preventing it from heating above 20 degree celsius as its compressed. how high pressure could be reached before autoignition? assume 10 to 1 (10:1) air to petrol mix.

Welcome to the PF.

What is the application?
 


Yes. Heat from compression is what causes autoignition, If you keep the heat down you could probably compress the mixture all the way to a liquid without igniting it.

Diesel engines rely on autoignition, they have no spark plugs. Older diesels were hard to start in cold weather because the air started out too cold to get hot enough during compression to ignite the fuel. That is why modern diesels have glow-plugs and intake air heaters.
 


If he's designing the engine he could design it to run at 1 revolution per hour if he wanted it to. At that speed it would be easy to remove heat from the air-fuel mixture. This would obviously not be practical for an automobile but he didn't say what the application was.
 


Lets not get carried away with this. Before we even start let's go through the basics.

Firstly with fuels there is a certain ratio that will give a chemically 'correct' burn. Called the stoichiometric point. For petrol the ratio is 14.7:1 (Air to fuel).

Anthing with less than this ratio is fuel rich (fuel left over). Anything more than this is fuel lean (air left over).

As you compress the air mixture it will increase in pressure and temperature. It will also absorb heat from the surroundings (ie the hot block).

Petrol autoignites due to temperature, pressure and mix conditions at point of ignition. (In reality there are hundreds of factors, but we can lump them into those three areas).So what can we do to prevent autoignition?
We can reduce the pressure.

(got to go to work, i'll finish later)
 


mrspeedybob said:
Yes. Heat from compression is what causes autoignition, If you keep the heat down you could probably compress the mixture all the way to a liquid without igniting it.

Diesel engines rely on autoignition, they have no spark plugs. Older diesels were hard to start in cold weather because the air started out too cold to get hot enough during compression to ignite the fuel. That is why modern diesels have glow-plugs and intake air heaters.

rcgldr said:
I doubt it's possible to extract a significant amount of heat from the fuel-air mixture during the short time of a compression cycle in an engine. Water vapor injection can be used to cool the intake air.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_injection_(engines)

Intercoolers are a common solution to this problem. When you compress the air in the compressor wheel of a turbocharger, that compressed air is then fed through an air-to-air passive cooler.

Proper intercooler function can keep auto-ignition from happening at higher compression levels. I used to have a Subaru STi which ran 18psi of positive pressure on the compressor exit side. If I didn't have an intercooler my compression ratio in the engine would have had to have been much lower than the 9.1:1 it was.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercooler

This only cools the air portion of the air-fuel mixture, but your fuel it only 1 part in 15 of the mixture.
 


thanks guys, was daydreaming about compressed air energy storage with the ability to ignite the mix as a power boost. Lots of time to daydream as I am a trucker. Thanks
 


daveyjones97 said:
thanks guys, was daydreaming about compressed air energy storage with the ability to ignite the mix as a power boost. Lots of time to daydream as I am a trucker. Thanks

I've had the EXACT same idea. Run a compressor off of your belt (or by exhaust, to fill a tank with compressed air. It's a similar premise to using nitrous oxide (the only goal being to add more O2 to the mixture so that more fuel can be burnt). Good for passing if you have a diesel.

There's nothing fundamentally wrong with it. Run the compressed air through an intercooler, or other heat exchanger, and be sure to compensate in your fuel map for the increased air.
 
  • #10


so let me try to understand this... it is possible to have an air compressor tank which is pumped by something like the turbo or supercharger, building up pressure...
which upon release will release a burst of cold air which can be blown at the intercooler/heat exchanger to increase the cooling simultaneously as the engine is being fed more pressure...

how about, the tank pressure is so high that being released into the intake manifold (i think) is enough to cause considerable adiabatic cooling as well as a direct boost in air pressure

the downside is if the tank and the pump will add enough weight and suck enough power to make all this not worth it... the high air pressure tank could take the place of a radiator, for instance, provided that it has enough internal volume and is structurally capable of handling the pressure in this shape... many cars are capable of high performance despite having the weight of a radiator and reservoir full of coolant
but it would also need to have all parts of the fuel and air line capable of withstanding the added pressure...
but if it works, it could be used analogously with a turbocharger, except without the turbo lag...you can have solenoid valves releasing the compressed air at certain engine performance conditions... the extra responsiveness should translate to not having as much extrapolation for the engine computer to anticipate wrongly, thereby saving fuel and increasing the perceived performance of the engine

but in any case, the tank's primary purpose is to be thermally conductive and hold air at such a high pressure that a meaningful amount of heat can be dissipated isobaricly , which makes it different from a supercharger which does not have the cooling function
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
23K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K