Delinquent Taxpayers: Why aren't they arrested?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons why certain delinquent taxpayers, including notable individuals, are not arrested despite being on tax delinquency lists. Participants explore various aspects of tax evasion, legal implications, and the enforcement of tax laws.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about why high-profile individuals, like NBA stars, are not arrested for tax delinquency, questioning the effectiveness of enforcement.
  • It is noted that some delinquent taxpayers may already be incarcerated or that their companies have gone bankrupt, which complicates the situation.
  • One participant humorously suggests that moving to a different state could be a strategy to avoid arrest for tax evasion.
  • Another participant points out that an arrest order in one state must be honored by another state, referencing constitutional obligations regarding extradition.
  • Wesley Snipes is mentioned as an example of someone who faced jail time for tax evasion, highlighting that not all delinquent taxpayers escape consequences, particularly for federal taxes.
  • Concerns are raised about broader issues of law enforcement priorities, with one participant suggesting that the government may prefer not to incarcerate individuals who cannot pay taxes from prison.
  • There are humorous remarks about the population of Wisconsin, with some participants expressing surprise at the existence of the state and its residents.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons behind the lack of arrests for delinquent taxpayers, with multiple competing views and humorous asides contributing to the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific legal principles, such as extradition, and the complexities surrounding tax delinquency cases, but do not resolve the underlying issues or assumptions regarding enforcement and legal consequences.

Messages
19,911
Reaction score
10,928
I was reading an article today about Wisconsin's tax "Wall of Shame". The article was interestingly enough about two NBA stars, Latrell Sprewell and Anthony Mason who are in the top three. Anyway, so the list is pretty staggering. I don't understand why these people are allowed to skip paying taxes. Why aren't these people arrested? Seems these people have been on the list for years.

http://www.revenue.wi.gov/delqlist/Topten.htm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your link doesn't work for me Greg.
 
Some of them are already in prison. Some of them are companies which have already gone under. As for Sprewell, so long as he avoids the Land of Cheese and Bratwurst, how can they arrest him?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Some of them are already in prison. Some of them are companies which have already gone under. As for Sprewell, so long as he avoids the Land of Cheese and Bratwurst, how can they arrest him?

So to avoid taxes all I need to do is move to a different state every few years? Not bad! :wink:
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Some of them are already in prison. Some of them are companies which have already gone under. As for Sprewell, so long as he avoids the Land of Cheese and Bratwurst, how can they arrest him?

An arrest order in one state must be honored by another which then extradites the person. It's in the Constitution.
 
Wesley Snipes is in jail for not paying his taxes, so not everyone who does it gets away with it. 'Course that was FEDERAL taxes. Tougher rap to beat.
 
This is amazing. I had no idea people lived in Wisconsin.
 
Eleven million illegal aliens working in this country, half of all homicides routinely going unsolved, and you ask why some delinquent tax payers aren't in prison? I suspect largely because they can't pay the government from a prison cell.
 
Pengwuino said:
This is amazing. I had no idea people lived in Wisconsin.

Actually, my understanding is is that there are a LOT more there (several dozen at least) than there are in North Dakota (about a dozen).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
31K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
69K
Replies
42
Views
8K