Delta fuction potential general solution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the general solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation in the context of a delta-function potential, specifically addressing the conditions for normalizable wave functions and the implications of the delta function's units.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the rejection of a wave function that diverges as $$x \to -\infty$$, suggesting it may be due to the search for normalizable solutions.
  • Another participant agrees that for $$x<0$$, the term must be set to zero to ensure normalizability, and notes that for $$x>0$$, a similar condition applies if $$\kappa>0$$.
  • A participant introduces the idea of solutions with $$\kappa \in \mathrm{i} \mathbb{R}$$, which may lead to scattering states that are not normalizable in the traditional sense but can be treated as generalized eigenfunctions.
  • There is a confirmation that restricting to bound-state solutions aligns with the requirement for normalizable wave functions.
  • A participant inquires about the units of the delta function, leading to an explanation related to charge density in electrodynamics and the necessity for the delta function to have units of 1/length to maintain dimensional consistency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of normalizable solutions for bound states, but there are multiple views regarding the implications of the delta function potential and the nature of scattering states. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the nature of wave functions and the specific conditions under which they are considered normalizable. The mathematical treatment of scattering states and their relationship to delta functions is also not fully explored.

Danny Boy
Messages
48
Reaction score
3
Hi, in the book 'Introduction to Quantum Mechanics' by Griffiths, on page 71 in the section 'The Delta-Function Potential' he states that the general solution to time independent Schrödinger Equation is $$\psi(x) = Ae^{-\kappa x} + B e^{\kappa x}$$

he then notes that the first term blows up as $$x \to -\infty,$$ so we must choose $$A=0.$$ Why is it that we are rejecting a wave function that goes to infinity? Is it simply because we are looking for normalizable solutions?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For ##x<0## you must choose ##A=0## and for ##x>0## you must have ##B=0##, if ##\kappa>0##. That's indeed, because you want to have bound states in this case, leading to normalizable wave functions. Note that there may be solutions with ##\kappa \in \mathrm{i} \mathbb{R}##, leading to scattering states with energy eigenvalues in the continuum, and these wave functions are generalized eigenfunctions that are "normalizable to a ##\delta## distribution" only.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Danny Boy
vanhees71 said:
For ##x<0## you must choose ##A=0## and for ##x>0## you must have ##B=0##, if ##\kappa>0##. That's indeed, because you want to have bound states in this case, leading to normalizable wave functions. Note that there may be solutions with ##\kappa \in \mathrm{i} \mathbb{R}##, leading to scattering states with energy eigenvalues in the continuum, and these wave functions are generalized eigenfunctions that are "normalizable to a ##\delta## distribution" only.
So my reasoning is correct then that we want normalizable solutions hence the requirement that the wave function is bounded?
 
If you restrict yourself to the bound-state solutions, it's correct.
 
vanhees71 said:
If you restrict yourself to the bound-state solutions, it's correct.
Okay thanks. One quick question, do you maybe know why the delta function is said to have units 1/length?
 
Simple explanation: in electrodynamics when you want to write (for example) charge density function for point charge in the origin. You would write that as ρ = q \delta (x) \delta (y) \delta (z) . You will write it in that way so that ∫ \rho dV over the whole space gives you the result q. But ρ must have units coulomb per volume, but in your formula you have coulombs in q, so delta functions have units 1/length
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Danny Boy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K