Determining bound states for delta function potential

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the bound states for a delta function potential described by the equation ##V(x)=-\alpha[\delta(x+a)+\delta(x-a)]##. Participants are exploring the mathematical formulation and boundary conditions related to the Schrödinger equation in this context, with a focus on the correct form of wave functions in different regions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents their approach to solving the problem, outlining the wave function forms for different regions but questions the discrepancies with the provided solution.
  • Another participant suggests that the missing case for ##x>a## in the solution is likely a typo and emphasizes the importance of imposing symmetry or anti-symmetry conditions on the wave function due to the symmetric nature of the potential.
  • A different participant expresses confusion about the calculation of the discontinuity in the derivative of the wave function and seeks clarification on how the solution differs from their own result.
  • One participant advises looking for solutions that are valid everywhere except at the points where the potential is non-zero, suggesting that boundary conditions can help determine the appropriate linear combinations of exponential functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to consider symmetry in the wave functions and the potential typo in the solution. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the specific forms of the wave functions and the calculation of the discontinuity in the derivative, with no consensus reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of boundary conditions and the behavior of the wave function at infinity, but there are unresolved aspects regarding the exact forms of the wave functions and the mathematical steps leading to the discontinuity calculation.

Logan Rudd
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a problem out of Griffith's Intro to QM 2nd Ed. and it's asking to find the bound states for for the potential ##V(x)=-\alpha[\delta(x+a)+\delta(x-a)]## This is what I'm doing so far:

$$
\mbox{for $x\lt-a$:}\hspace{1cm}\psi=Ae^{\kappa a}\\
\mbox{for $-a\lt x\lt a$}\hspace{1cm}\psi=Be^{-\kappa x}+Ce^{\kappa x}\\
\mbox{and for $x\gt a$:}\hspace{1cm}\psi=De^{-\kappa a}
$$

However, this is what the solution reads:
$$
\mbox{for $x\lt a$:}\hspace{1cm}\psi=Ae^{-\kappa a}\\
\mbox{for $-a\lt x\lt a$}\hspace{1cm}\psi=B(e^{\kappa x}+e^{-\kappa x})\\
\mbox{and for $x\lt-a$:}\hspace{1cm}\psi=Ae^{\kappa a}
$$

Can someone explain what I'm doing wrong - why they are getting the coefficients they are - and what I should be doing? Maybe go over the general way of approaching these kind of problems? I'm also wondering why they don't have the case for $x>a$?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The missing case for ##x>a## has to be a typo - the first line of the solution has a ##<## where ##>## was intended.

You will make more headway with the constants if you impose the additional condition that ##\psi## has to be symmetric or anti-symmetric. These constraints are OK because the potential is symmetric and the solution for a symmetric potential can always be written as a linear combination of symmetric and antisymmetric solutions.
 
Thanks! That makes it much clearer. I figured it was a typo but was kind of confused to begin with.
 
After this I am trying to figure out what ##\Delta\left(\frac{d\psi}{dx}\right)## is. Integrating the potential part of SWE and taking the limit as ##\epsilon## approaches ##\pm a## I get:

$$
\Delta\left(\frac{d\psi}{dx}\right)=-\frac{2m}{\hbar ^2}\left[\alpha\psi(a)+\alpha\psi(-a)\right]
$$
but the solution reads ##\Delta\left(\frac{d\psi}{dx}\right)=-\frac{2m\alpha}{\hbar^2}\psi(a)##
I think I'm close but not sure how they got their result. Do you see what I'm doing? Can you correct where I made any mistakes?
 
Look for solutions to the Schrödinger equation that work everywhere except at the two points where the potential is not zero. By inspection (also called "lucky guess" or "thoughtful selection of ansatz" or "the way most differential equations get solved") these have to be linear combinations of ##e^{kx}## and ##e^{-kx}##. Your boundary conditions tell you that ##\psi## goes to zero as ##x## goes to infinity in either direction; and you allowed to assume that the solution is either symmetric or antisymmetric. Those conditions are sufficient to determine which linear combinations (that is, what the coefficients are) of ##e^{kx}## and ##e^{-kx}## are solutions in the three regions of interest.

If find yourself tiring of the PhysicsForums rule that we will help you find the solution yourself but won't just give you the answer... Google will find a bunch of solutions. But I hope you'll keep working at it yourself - you are a differential equation away from victory.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K