Delta fuction potential general solution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Delta-Function Potential as described in Griffiths' 'Introduction to Quantum Mechanics'. The general solution to the time-independent Schrödinger Equation is given by $$\psi(x) = Ae^{-\kappa x} + B e^{\kappa x}$$, where the term with $$A$$ is rejected for normalizability, leading to the requirement that $$A=0$$ for $$x<0$$ and $$B=0$$ for $$x>0$$ when $$\kappa>0$$. The conversation also touches on the interpretation of delta functions having units of 1/length, particularly in the context of charge density for point charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the time-independent Schrödinger Equation
  • Familiarity with wave functions and their normalizability
  • Knowledge of delta functions in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of bound states and scattering states
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of normalizable wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of delta functions in various physical contexts
  • Learn about bound states versus scattering states in quantum systems
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of generalized eigenfunctions
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists interested in potential theory, and anyone studying the mathematical foundations of wave functions and delta functions.

Danny Boy
Messages
48
Reaction score
3
Hi, in the book 'Introduction to Quantum Mechanics' by Griffiths, on page 71 in the section 'The Delta-Function Potential' he states that the general solution to time independent Schrödinger Equation is $$\psi(x) = Ae^{-\kappa x} + B e^{\kappa x}$$

he then notes that the first term blows up as $$x \to -\infty,$$ so we must choose $$A=0.$$ Why is it that we are rejecting a wave function that goes to infinity? Is it simply because we are looking for normalizable solutions?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For ##x<0## you must choose ##A=0## and for ##x>0## you must have ##B=0##, if ##\kappa>0##. That's indeed, because you want to have bound states in this case, leading to normalizable wave functions. Note that there may be solutions with ##\kappa \in \mathrm{i} \mathbb{R}##, leading to scattering states with energy eigenvalues in the continuum, and these wave functions are generalized eigenfunctions that are "normalizable to a ##\delta## distribution" only.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Danny Boy
vanhees71 said:
For ##x<0## you must choose ##A=0## and for ##x>0## you must have ##B=0##, if ##\kappa>0##. That's indeed, because you want to have bound states in this case, leading to normalizable wave functions. Note that there may be solutions with ##\kappa \in \mathrm{i} \mathbb{R}##, leading to scattering states with energy eigenvalues in the continuum, and these wave functions are generalized eigenfunctions that are "normalizable to a ##\delta## distribution" only.
So my reasoning is correct then that we want normalizable solutions hence the requirement that the wave function is bounded?
 
If you restrict yourself to the bound-state solutions, it's correct.
 
vanhees71 said:
If you restrict yourself to the bound-state solutions, it's correct.
Okay thanks. One quick question, do you maybe know why the delta function is said to have units 1/length?
 
Simple explanation: in electrodynamics when you want to write (for example) charge density function for point charge in the origin. You would write that as ρ = q \delta (x) \delta (y) \delta (z) . You will write it in that way so that ∫ \rho dV over the whole space gives you the result q. But ρ must have units coulomb per volume, but in your formula you have coulombs in q, so delta functions have units 1/length
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Danny Boy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K