Undergrad Delta Notation in GR: Replacing vs Raising/Lowering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of delta notation in General Relativity, specifically the expression ##g_{ab}g^{ac}=\delta^{(4)c}_b##. Participants clarify that this notation signifies a replacement rather than a raising or lowering of indices, which is why using ##\delta_{bc}## would introduce unnecessary complications. The identity transformation on ##\omega_c## is valid, but using ##\delta_{bc}## would violate summation rules and create inconsistencies between covariant and contravariant indices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity notation
  • Familiarity with covariant and contravariant indices
  • Knowledge of tensor operations
  • Basic grasp of identity transformations in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of delta notation in tensor calculus
  • Learn about covariant and contravariant transformations in General Relativity
  • Research identity transformations and their applications in physics
  • Explore the rules of summation in tensor algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on General Relativity, tensor analysis, and mathematical physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking clarity on delta notation and its implications in tensor operations.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Hi

So we write ##g_{ab}g^{ac}=\delta^{(4)c}_b ##, but this simply means to replace ##b## with ##c## or vice versa, so, why don't we write ##\delta_{bc}##?

Thanks

i.e. the affect is not to replace and raise/lower, it is simply to replace, so I'm a bit confused by the notation...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could write ##g_{ab}g^{ac}\omega_c=\delta^c_b\omega_c##. Not sure exactly why you'd want to do that since it's an identity transform on ##\omega_c##, but it's legit. If you wrote ##\delta_{bc}## the right hand side would have to be treated as a special exception to the summation rules. Why have an unnecessary special case?
 
If you wrote ##\delta_{ab}## you would end up with inconsistencies in the matching between covariant and contravariant indices.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K