Density-density interaction in Luttinger liquids

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AdeBlackRune
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction Liquids
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of equation (6) from equation (4) in the context of Luttinger liquids, specifically referencing the work of Lal et al. Participants emphasize the use of Fourier transformation to simplify a double integral in variables x and y into a single integral in x, under the assumption of a finite range potential. Key components of the potential, V(0) and V(2kf), are identified as critical for the transformation process. The variable x in equation (6) is confirmed to correspond directly with momentum space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Luttinger liquid theory
  • Familiarity with Fourier transformation techniques
  • Knowledge of renormalization group methods
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics and weakly interacting quantum wires
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations in Luttinger liquid models
  • Learn advanced Fourier transformation applications in quantum physics
  • Explore renormalization group techniques in condensed matter physics
  • Investigate the implications of finite range potentials in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in condensed matter physics, quantum mechanics researchers, and students studying Luttinger liquids and their mathematical formulations.

AdeBlackRune
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm reading ad article of Lal et al (junction of several weakly interaction quantum wires: a renormalization group study). It's quite cleare but there are some row I'm not good to understand. Could someone help me to understand how obtain equation (6) from equation (4)? I don't know how to obtain from a double integral in x and y a single integral in x under the assumption of a finite range potential.
 

Attachments

  • junc.jpg
    junc.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 491
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you could solve it by Fourier transform, and then take only the Fourier components of the potential V(0) and V(2kf) to be nonzero. Then transform it back.
 
Agree with OhYoungLions.

Fourier transformation.

The variable x in Eq. (6) strictly accords with momentum space。
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
645
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K