Density matrix for bell states

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the density matrix for Bell states in quantum mechanics. The participants clarify that the density matrix for pure states, such as \(\frac{|00\rangle + |11\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}\) and \(\frac{|00\rangle - |11\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}\), results in a 2x2 matrix, while mixed states like \(\frac{|01\rangle + |01\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}\) yield a different structure. The correct approach to derive the density matrix involves using the formula \(\rho = |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|\) for pure states and recognizing that the density matrix for a composite system is 4x4. The distinction between pure and mixed states is emphasized, particularly in relation to the Schmidt coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum states and notation (e.g., kets, density matrices)
  • Familiarity with Bell states and their properties
  • Knowledge of pure versus mixed states in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of linear algebra as it applies to quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of density matrices for various quantum states
  • Learn about Schmidt decomposition and its implications for entangled states
  • Explore the differences between pure and mixed states in greater detail
  • Investigate the role of the trace operation in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the mathematical representation of quantum states and their properties.

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi
I have three states (I believe bell states) and want to find the density matrix, am I right in thinking:
1) \frac{|00&gt; + |11&gt;}{\sqrt{2}} \rightarrow \rho = \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\<br /> \end{array} \right) (because it is pure)

2) \frac{|00&gt; - |11&gt;}{\sqrt{2}} \rightarrow \rho = \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\<br /> \end{array} \right) (because it is pure)

3) \frac{|01&gt; + |01&gt;}{\sqrt{2}} \rightarrow \rho = \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} &amp; \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} &amp; \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\<br /> \end{array} \right) (because it is mixed)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't the density matrix be 4x4? The first one should be something like

<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

The others then analogously, but a 100% I am not certain, because looking at the Schmidt-coefficients, they are not all the same (2 are actually 0) as required for a maximally entangled state. Anyone can solve this issue?
 
You get the density matrix of the composite system by writing out ρ= |ψ><ψ| for your states. This is a 4x4 matrix.

If you want to get the reduced density matrix of one subsystem,you have to trace over the other system. You then get a 2x2 matrix.

PS: Why do you think that the third state is not pure? Every ket corresponds to a pure state. You seem to have some fundamental misunderstanding. You need to give more details about your calculations.
 
Last edited:
spookyfw said:
[...] looking at the Schmidt-coefficients, they are not all the same (2 are actually 0) as required for a maximally entangled state.
You need only as many coefficents as the dimension of the Hilbert space of the smaller subsystem. Here, we have two 2-dimensional Hilbert spaces, so we need two coefficients.
 
Please could you describe the difference between a pure and a mixed state?
I am also unclear as to how to calculate the density matrix, could you give me a simple example, I can't see why \sum_i |\psi_i&gt;&lt;\psi_i| would give a 4x4 matrix.

Would you have to decompose |00&gt; into |0>|0> and then into,
(A|0> + B|1>)Tensor-product(C|0>+D|1>)? I am a bit confused
 
A pure state can be a linear combination of other pure states. This is the quantum mechanical superposition.

For a pure state |ψ> we simply chose this state |ψ> to construct the density matrix

ρ = |ψ><ψ|

As you can see you have ρ2 = ρ, so ρ is a projector (here we do not care whether there are other states, e.g. u and v, which can be combined via a linear superposition to get ψ).

A mixed state is always described via a density matrix which is not a projector.

For a mixed state, in a basis where the density matrix is diagonal, you have two or more states with non-vanishing probability. So for two orthogonal states contributing to a density matrix you have

ρ = p|u><u| + (1-p)|v><v|

Note that for a diagonal density matrix the trace of the probailities must be = 1.

Testing whether ρ is a projector you find

ρ2 = p2|u><u| + (1-p)2|v><v| ≠ ρ

The probabilities p and (1-p) in ρ are classical probabilities, not related to the quantum mechanical superpositions. So if you would construct ψ from u and v using quantum mechanical superpositions you get the pure state as described above.
 
Have you calculated \rho = |\psi&gt;&lt;\psi| = \frac{1}{2}(|00&gt; + |11&gt;)(&lt;00|+&lt;11|)? (First example from you)

ρ has 16 entries which are the coefficients in front of the 16 possible combinations |ij><kl|. Most of them are zero, but 4 are non-zero. If you arrange them in matrix form, you are done.

No decomposing of |ij> is required, because we are now dealing with the combined state space of two quibits. There are states which can't be decomposed and these are the entangled states.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
821
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K