Depth of Water and Energy Required to Boil

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy required to boil sap in a pan of varying depths, specifically comparing a pan measuring 2' wide x 3' long x 6" deep to a shallower 1" layer of sap. It is established that the energy needed to evaporate the sap is the same per volume, but deeper pans experience greater heat loss through the sides, complicating the boiling process. The conversation highlights the importance of convection currents in heat distribution and the challenges of overheating in deeper pans, particularly when syrup thickens. Industrial boiler designs are mentioned as examples of effective heat circulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics
  • Understanding of heat transfer mechanisms
  • Knowledge of convection currents in liquids
  • Familiarity with industrial boiler systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of heat transfer in liquids
  • Learn about the design and operation of industrial boilers
  • Study the effects of pressure on boiling points and energy requirements
  • Explore the physics of convection currents in various fluid dynamics contexts
USEFUL FOR

Anyone involved in culinary science, food processing, or industrial heating systems, particularly those interested in the physics of boiling and energy efficiency in cooking processes.

tempuser1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been out of college for more than 20 years and my basic physics knowledge has become quite rusty. Someone made a statement today related to making maple syrup. They stated the energy required to boil a pan of sap 2' wide x 3' long x 6" deep was the same as the energy required to boil 1" of sap in the same pan. Am I correct in thinking the energy required to boil the shallower sap would be less? Wouldn't it take more energy for the air bubbles to pass through a deeper column of sap? Thanks for the input! -John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose your friends meant the amount of energy per volume of sap, and they did not mean it would take the same energy to boil off six times as much sap.

The bulk of the energy needed, is to evaporate the water in the sap, and that will be the same for a shallow pan and for a deep pan, however:
A deep pan will leak more heat through the environment through the sides.

The energy lost by the bubbles isn't a factor, because any friction would be converted to heat, but when the syrup becomes thick, overheating the bottom of a deep pan
becomes a problem, because heat loss by convection becomes harder, and it also becomes harder for the steam bubbles to get out of the area.
To prevent this you need to reduce the heat, and the heat available for evaportation wil then become less, while the heat lost to the air around the pan will remain the same, because the pan is still at boiling temperature.
 
tempuser1 said:
I have been out of college for more than 20 years and my basic physics knowledge has become quite rusty. Someone made a statement today related to making maple syrup. They stated the energy required to boil a pan of sap 2' wide x 3' long x 6" deep was the same as the energy required to boil 1" of sap in the same pan. Am I correct in thinking the energy required to boil the shallower sap would be less? Wouldn't it take more energy for the air bubbles to pass through a deeper column of sap? Thanks for the input! -John

It's true that, boiling water in a higher pressure requires more energy. But, to my knowledge, the heat in the bottom causes convection currents of water and brings heated water to the surface. I haven't seen it, but i think the water bubbles in the surface finally not at the button, unless the heating rate is so much that the convection currents can't transfer it effectively. Industrial boilers are made of an upper thank connected to a lower tank via two bunches of tubes one on each sides. They form loops of water current. The flame heats the pipes on one side more than the other side, this makes the water to go up via tubes on the more heated side and return back to the lower tank via the less heated side. The circulation is continuous and the evaporation takes place in the upper thank because the pressure is lower there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
43K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K