Derivation of an expression involving boson operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter patric44
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons
patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
derive the following expression involving boson operator
Relevant Equations
B=\sum_{i}\alpha_{i}b_{i}
Hi all
I found this expression in a paper that concerns the derivation of some relations about boson operators but it is not very clear to me how the results were obtained. The derivation starts as, let B be an operator as a linear combination of different boson operators:
$$
B=\sum_{i}\alpha_{i}b_{i}
$$
then the expectation value of the identity operator in the n-boson state is :
$$
\bra{B^{n}}\hat{1}\ket{(B^{\dagger})^{n}}=\bra{B^{n-1}}\sum_{i}\alpha_{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial b^{\dagger}_{i}}\ket{(B^{\dagger})^{n}}=n\alpa^{2}N_{n-1}
$$
where the partial derivative came from? and what is big N,the paper doesn't mention that, shouldn't the expression be :
$$
\bra{B^{n}}\hat{1}\ket{(B^{\dagger})^{n}}=\bra{B^{n-1}}B\ket{(B^{\dagger})^{n}}=\bra{B^{n-1}}\sum_{i}\alpha_{i}b_{i}\ket{(B^{\dagger})^{n}}
$$
can any one clarify, I will appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
patric44 said:
Homework Statement: derive the following expression involving boson operator
Relevant Equations: B=\sum_{i}\alpha_{i}b_{i}
Did you forget some hash hash symbols?

patric44 said:
I found this expression in a paper
It's usually a good idea to include a link to your source, just in case you've mistyped or misunderstood something.

patric44 said:
where the partial derivative came from?
It's possible to prove a general formula like $$[a, f(a^\dagger)] ~=~ i\hbar \, \partial_{a^\dagger} f(a^\dagger) ~.$$The constant ##i\hbar## factor might be different depending on what conventions you're using for the canonical commutation relations. (Exercise: use induction to prove this formula for simple functions like ##f(x) = x^n##, then use linearity of the commutator to generalize the formula to polynomials.)
patric44 said:
and what is big N,
I'm guessing it's the number operator, something involving ##\sum_i b_i^\dagger b_i##.
patric44 said:
the paper doesn't mention that, shouldn't the expression be :
$$
\bra{B^{n}}\hat{1}\ket{(B^{\dagger})^{n}}=\bra{B^{n-1}}B\ket{(B^{\dagger})^{n}}=\bra{B^{n-1}}\sum_{i}\alpha_{i}b_{i}\ket{(B^{\dagger})^{n}}
$$
Without seeing the paper, it's impossible to say for sure. But my guess is "no". Write out the expression properly and apply the rule I described above.
 
strangerep said:
Did you forget some hash hash symbols?It's usually a good idea to include a link to your source, just in case you've mistyped or misunderstood something.It's possible to prove a general formula like $$[a, f(a^\dagger)] ~=~ i\hbar \, \partial_{a^\dagger} f(a^\dagger) ~.$$The constant ##i\hbar## factor might be different depending on what conventions you're using for the canonical commutation relations. (Exercise: use induction to prove this formula for simple functions like ##f(x) = x^n##, then use linearity of the commutator to generalize the formula to polynomials.)

I'm guessing it's the number operator, something involving ##\sum_i b_i^\dagger b_i##.

Without seeing the paper, it's impossible to say for sure. But my guess is "no". Write out the expression properly and apply the rule I described above.
the paper isn't open access so I thought I would write the question separably, here is the link of the paper:
the paper, the commutation relation is included in the paper but i am not interested in proving them, rather my concern is equations 4a,4b,4c
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top