Derivation of complex refractive index

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the complex refractive index from the Helmholtz equation, specifically the relationship between the refractive index \( n \) and the extinction coefficient \( \kappa \). The participants clarify that starting from the equation \( n^2 = \mu c^2 (\epsilon + i \frac{\sigma}{\omega}) \), one can derive the relations \( n^2 = \frac{1}{2} \mu c^2 \epsilon (\sqrt{1 + (\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon \omega})^2} + 1) \) and \( \kappa^2 = \frac{1}{2} \mu c^2 \epsilon (\sqrt{1 + (\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon \omega})^2} - 1) \) by solving a quadratic equation after substituting \( n = n + i\kappa \). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly manipulating complex numbers in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Helmholtz equation
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their manipulation
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic theory, particularly refractive index concepts
  • Basic algebra skills for solving quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Helmholtz equation in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about complex refractive indices in optics
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for solving quadratic equations
  • Investigate the physical significance of the extinction coefficient in materials
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, optical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism or optics who are interested in the mathematical foundations of refractive indices and their applications in material science.

OneMoreName
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hi,

Got a problem with the following derivation:

Coming from the Helmholtz equation one gets:

\textbf{n}^2=\muc^{2}(\epsilon+i\frac{\sigma}{\omega})

which is of course something like:

\textbf{n}=n+i\kappa

My question is, how do you obtain the following relations?

n^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\muc^{2}\epsilon(\sqrt{1+(\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon\omega})^{2}}+1)
\kappa^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\muc^{2}\epsilon(\sqrt{1+(\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon\omega})^{2}}-1)

Maybe it's obvious, but I am arriving at everything but this. Enlighten me guys and thanks if you do.
 
Science news on Phys.org
n=n+ik, put into n^2 and you will have two eqn ,one equating the real part and other equating the imaginary part which you can solve to get.if that is what you are asking.
 
That's right, but the problem is you cannot separate n or κ out. For example you get something like

n^{2}(n^{2}-\muc^{2}\epsilon)=(\frac{μc^{2}σ}{2ω})^{2}

and I don't see how to get to n2.

Oh, OK, just have to solve the quadratic equation after substitution and one gets to the results, duh! Thanks!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K