Derivation of complex refractive index

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 5K views
OneMoreName
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Hi,

Got a problem with the following derivation:

Coming from the Helmholtz equation one gets:

[itex]\textbf{n}^2[/itex]=[itex]\mu[/itex][itex]c^{2}[/itex]([itex]\epsilon[/itex]+i[itex]\frac{\sigma}{\omega}[/itex])

which is of course something like:

[itex]\textbf{n}[/itex]=n+i[itex]\kappa[/itex]

My question is, how do you obtain the following relations?

[itex]n^{2}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex][itex]\mu[/itex][itex]c^{2}[/itex][itex]\epsilon[/itex]([itex]\sqrt{1+(\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon\omega})^{2}}[/itex]+1)
[itex]\kappa^{2}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex][itex]\mu[/itex][itex]c^{2}[/itex][itex]\epsilon[/itex]([itex]\sqrt{1+(\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon\omega})^{2}}[/itex]-1)

Maybe it's obvious, but I am arriving at everything but this. Enlighten me guys and thanks if you do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]n[/tex]=n+ik, put into [tex]n^2[/tex] and you will have two eqn ,one equating the real part and other equating the imaginary part which you can solve to get.if that is what you are asking.
 
That's right, but the problem is you cannot separate n or κ out. For example you get something like

[itex]n^{2}[/itex]([itex]n^{2}[/itex]-[itex]\mu[/itex][itex]c^{2}[/itex][itex]\epsilon[/itex])=([itex]\frac{μc^{2}σ}{2ω})^{2}[/itex]

and I don't see how to get to n2.

Oh, OK, just have to solve the quadratic equation after substitution and one gets to the results, duh! Thanks!
 
Last edited: