Derivation of energy and angular momentum (Schwarzschild metric)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of energy and angular momentum within the context of the Schwarzschild metric in general relativity. Participants are examining the relationships between the Lagrangian and the constants of motion associated with cyclic variables.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive expressions for energy and angular momentum from the Lagrangian, questioning the presence of a factor of 2 in their results compared to the task sheet.
  • Some participants suggest that the factor of 2 can be incorporated into the definition of the constants, indicating that it does not affect the physical interpretation of the orbits.
  • Others raise questions about the assumptions made regarding the constants and how they relate to customary definitions in the literature.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical derivations and clarifying the definitions of constants. There is a recognition that the factor of 2 does not alter the underlying physics, and the discussion is exploring the implications of different definitions without reaching a consensus on the original poster's approach.

Contextual Notes

There is an implicit assumption that the constants of motion are defined in a way that aligns with standard conventions in the literature, which may differ from the original poster's approach.

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Derive the equations ##E= mc^2 \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) \dot{t}## and ##l=mr^2 \dot{\varphi}##
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

Unfortunately, I can't quite work out the terms in the task

Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-21 um 14.58.16.png

Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-21 um 14.58.41.png


The expression in the integral (4) corresponds to the Lagrangian and since ##t## and ##\varphi## are cyclic variables, the following follows:

$$-\frac{d}{dt} \frac{d L}{d \dot{t}}=0 \quad \rightarrow \quad -\frac{d L}{d \dot{t}}=const=E$$

$$-\frac{d}{dt} \frac{d L}{d \dot{\varphi}}=0 \quad \rightarrow \quad -\frac{d L}{d \dot{\varphi}}=const=l$$

Then I received the following:

$$\frac{d}{d \dot{t}} \Bigl( m \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) c^2 \dot{t}^2 \Bigr)= 2m \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) c^2 \dot{t} =E$$

$$\frac{d}{d \dot{\varphi}} \Bigl( m r^2 \dot{\varphi}^2 \Bigr)= 2m r^2 \dot{\varphi}=l$$

I get the same results except for the 2, just my question, did I do something wrong or was the 2 forgotten in the task sheet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply called what is usually called ##E## by ##2E## and the same for angular momentum. If ##E## is constant, then obviously ##2E## is constant as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
As Orodruin says, you can simply take the 2 into the definition of the constant, or not. It makes no difference to the orbits.

However, the reason for the book not having a 2 is that they've chosen their constants to match up to customary definitions. For example, instead of defining ##-dL/d\dot{t}=E## you could have used ##-dL/d\dot{t}=A## where ##A## is an unknown constant. Then you'd get to ##2m\left(1-\frac{r_s}r\right)c^2\dot{t}=A##. Now consider an orbit where the particle comes instantaneously to rest at infinity. What happens to the LHS? And hence how would you define ##A##?

Essentially, you jumped in a bit early with assuming the first constant you saw was ##E##. If you don't assume that and instead use a generic unknown constant, then you can find a case where you can write that constant in terms of what you know.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
Thanks Orodruin for your help 👍, I thought I had done something wrong I hadn't thought of this simple observation :smile:

Thanks also Ibix for your help 👍
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K