Derivation of energy and angular momentum (Schwarzschild metric)

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Derive the equations ##E= mc^2 \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) \dot{t}## and ##l=mr^2 \dot{\varphi}##
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

Unfortunately, I can't quite work out the terms in the task

Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-21 um 14.58.16.png

Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-21 um 14.58.41.png


The expression in the integral (4) corresponds to the Lagrangian and since ##t## and ##\varphi## are cyclic variables, the following follows:

$$-\frac{d}{dt} \frac{d L}{d \dot{t}}=0 \quad \rightarrow \quad -\frac{d L}{d \dot{t}}=const=E$$

$$-\frac{d}{dt} \frac{d L}{d \dot{\varphi}}=0 \quad \rightarrow \quad -\frac{d L}{d \dot{\varphi}}=const=l$$

Then I received the following:

$$\frac{d}{d \dot{t}} \Bigl( m \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) c^2 \dot{t}^2 \Bigr)= 2m \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) c^2 \dot{t} =E$$

$$\frac{d}{d \dot{\varphi}} \Bigl( m r^2 \dot{\varphi}^2 \Bigr)= 2m r^2 \dot{\varphi}=l$$

I get the same results except for the 2, just my question, did I do something wrong or was the 2 forgotten in the task sheet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply called what is usually called ##E## by ##2E## and the same for angular momentum. If ##E## is constant, then obviously ##2E## is constant as well.
 
As Orodruin says, you can simply take the 2 into the definition of the constant, or not. It makes no difference to the orbits.

However, the reason for the book not having a 2 is that they've chosen their constants to match up to customary definitions. For example, instead of defining ##-dL/d\dot{t}=E## you could have used ##-dL/d\dot{t}=A## where ##A## is an unknown constant. Then you'd get to ##2m\left(1-\frac{r_s}r\right)c^2\dot{t}=A##. Now consider an orbit where the particle comes instantaneously to rest at infinity. What happens to the LHS? And hence how would you define ##A##?

Essentially, you jumped in a bit early with assuming the first constant you saw was ##E##. If you don't assume that and instead use a generic unknown constant, then you can find a case where you can write that constant in terms of what you know.
 
Thanks Orodruin for your help 👍, I thought I had done something wrong I hadn't thought of this simple observation :smile:

Thanks also Ibix for your help 👍
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...
Back
Top