Derivation of energy and angular momentum (Schwarzschild metric)

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Derive the equations ##E= mc^2 \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) \dot{t}## and ##l=mr^2 \dot{\varphi}##
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

Unfortunately, I can't quite work out the terms in the task

Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-21 um 14.58.16.png

Bildschirmfoto 2025-01-21 um 14.58.41.png


The expression in the integral (4) corresponds to the Lagrangian and since ##t## and ##\varphi## are cyclic variables, the following follows:

$$-\frac{d}{dt} \frac{d L}{d \dot{t}}=0 \quad \rightarrow \quad -\frac{d L}{d \dot{t}}=const=E$$

$$-\frac{d}{dt} \frac{d L}{d \dot{\varphi}}=0 \quad \rightarrow \quad -\frac{d L}{d \dot{\varphi}}=const=l$$

Then I received the following:

$$\frac{d}{d \dot{t}} \Bigl( m \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) c^2 \dot{t}^2 \Bigr)= 2m \bigl( 1- \frac{r_s}{r} \bigr) c^2 \dot{t} =E$$

$$\frac{d}{d \dot{\varphi}} \Bigl( m r^2 \dot{\varphi}^2 \Bigr)= 2m r^2 \dot{\varphi}=l$$

I get the same results except for the 2, just my question, did I do something wrong or was the 2 forgotten in the task sheet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply called what is usually called ##E## by ##2E## and the same for angular momentum. If ##E## is constant, then obviously ##2E## is constant as well.
 
As Orodruin says, you can simply take the 2 into the definition of the constant, or not. It makes no difference to the orbits.

However, the reason for the book not having a 2 is that they've chosen their constants to match up to customary definitions. For example, instead of defining ##-dL/d\dot{t}=E## you could have used ##-dL/d\dot{t}=A## where ##A## is an unknown constant. Then you'd get to ##2m\left(1-\frac{r_s}r\right)c^2\dot{t}=A##. Now consider an orbit where the particle comes instantaneously to rest at infinity. What happens to the LHS? And hence how would you define ##A##?

Essentially, you jumped in a bit early with assuming the first constant you saw was ##E##. If you don't assume that and instead use a generic unknown constant, then you can find a case where you can write that constant in terms of what you know.
 
Thanks Orodruin for your help 👍, I thought I had done something wrong I hadn't thought of this simple observation :smile:

Thanks also Ibix for your help 👍
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top