Derivation of eq of motion of q in static E?

Click For Summary
The equation of motion for a charge q in a static electric field E is expressed as d/dt γmv = qE. Some textbooks derive this equation using Maxwell's equations, but there is interest in deriving it from basic principles like Newton's law and Coulomb's law. A discussion on tensors highlights the need for a tensor equation to maintain consistency across different reference frames, leading to the form dp^j/dτ = F^{jk}v_k. This equation suggests that the force tensor F must align with the electric field in the nonrelativistic limit. The conversation emphasizes the foundational role of these principles in understanding electromagnetic interactions.
jason12345
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
The equation of motion for q in a static E is given by:

d/dt \gamma mv = qE

Some textbooks use the above equation in deriving Maxwell's equtions, but is there a way of deriving this equation from elementary assumptions such as Newton's law in q's frame and Coulomb's law?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know about tensors, then the following may help. If we're going to define something like an electromagnetic field in terms of what it does to a test charge, then that definition has to be expressed in terms of a tensor equation, or else it wouldn't have the same form in all frames of reference. The tensor we want to predict is dp^j/d\tau, and the only thing it can depend on besides the field is the particle's motion, described by its four-velocity v^k. Given these facts, the most general tensor equation we can have is of the form dp^j/d\tau = F^{jk}v_k. If all of this is going to match up with Newton's laws in the nonrelativistic limit, then the time-space components of F have to be the electric field.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
590