- #1
cosmic onion
- 28
- 2
What is wrong with the simple localised geometric derivation of the Euler Lagrange equation. As opposed to the standard derivation that Lagrange provided.
Sorry I haven't mastered writing mathematically using latex. I will have a look at this over the next few days.
More clarification. I seen a simple derivation that looked at the change in position of a length of rope at a single point and the increase in the gradient to the left and decrease of the gradient to the right at the same point, adding up these variations gave a neat and easy derivation of euler lagrange and made the terms make sense
What's wrong get with the simple euler derivation.
Sorry may have to rewrite this once I have practiced latex.
Sorry I haven't mastered writing mathematically using latex. I will have a look at this over the next few days.
More clarification. I seen a simple derivation that looked at the change in position of a length of rope at a single point and the increase in the gradient to the left and decrease of the gradient to the right at the same point, adding up these variations gave a neat and easy derivation of euler lagrange and made the terms make sense
What's wrong get with the simple euler derivation.
Sorry may have to rewrite this once I have practiced latex.