What is wrong with the simple localised geometric derivation of the Euler Lagrange equation. As opposed to the standard derivation that Lagrange provided.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Sorry I haven't mastered writing mathematically using latex. I will have a look at this over the next few days.

More clarification. I seen a simple derivation that looked at the change in position of a length of rope at a single point and the increase in the gradient to the left and decrease of the gradient to the right at the same point, adding up these variations gave a neat and easy derivation of euler lagrange and made the terms make sense

What's wrong get with the simple euler derivation.

Sorry may have to rewrite this once I have practiced latex.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Derivation of Euler Lagrange, variations

Tags:

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Derivation Euler Lagrange | Date |
---|---|

I Euler Lagrange formula with higher derivatives | Jan 24, 2018 |

Euler Lagrange Derivation (Taylor Series) | Jan 15, 2016 |

Expanding delta in Field Theory Derivation of Euler-Lagrange Equations | Feb 22, 2014 |

Help with Derivation of Euler Lagrange Equation | Jun 30, 2012 |

A question about the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation | Mar 28, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**