Derivation of first integral Euler-Lagrange equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the first integral of the Euler-Lagrange equation, as presented in a problem from Classical Mechanics by John Taylor. The problem involves analyzing the conditions under which the function f(y, y', x) does not depend on x and exploring the implications of this on the Euler-Lagrange equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the substitution of the Euler-Lagrange equation into the given equations and the resulting expressions. There is a focus on the application of the chain rule and the manipulation of derivatives. Questions arise regarding the presence of terms and their cancellation in the derived equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively engaging in clarifying the steps taken in the derivation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of terms and the use of identities related to derivatives, but no consensus has been reached on the specific steps or identities involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of the Euler-Lagrange equation and its implications, with particular attention to the assumptions made about the function f and its derivatives. There is an acknowledgment of potential confusion regarding the application of the chain rule and the treatment of terms in the equations.

martyg314
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Derivation of "first integral" Euler-Lagrange equation

Homework Statement



This is from Classical Mechanics by John Taylor, Problem 6.20:

Argue that if it happens that f(y,y',x) does not depend on x then:

EQUATION 1
<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=\frac{\delta f}{\delta y}y&#039;+\frac{\delta f}{\delta y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;<br />

Use the Euler-Lagrange equation to replace \frac{\delta f}{\delta y} on the RHS and show that:

EQUATION 2
<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=\frac{d}{dx}\left ( y&#039;\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} \right )<br />

This gives you the first integral:

EQUATION 3
<br /> f-y&#039;\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}=constant<br />


Homework Equations



E/L equation:

<br /> \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}=\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the E/L equation to substitute into EQUATION 1 to get:

<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;<br />

Then I used the chain rule to get:

EQUATION 4
<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=y&#039;\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}\frac{d}{dx}y&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;<br />

Which equals

<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=y&#039;\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;<br />


However, based on solutions I've seen the two y'' terms should cancel, leaving EQUATION 2

The solution I saw showed that after the substitution, EQUATION 4 is instead:

<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=y&#039;\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}\frac{d}{dx}y&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;<br />


Is there some chain rule identity of some sort I'm missing? I just don't see where the negative comes from to cancel the two terms.

Thanks,

MG
 
Physics news on Phys.org


martyg314 said:
E/L equation:

<br /> \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}=\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the E/L equation to substitute into EQUATION 1 to get:

<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;<br />

You should really write this as

<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=\left(\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}\right)y&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;~~(*)<br />

since you're getting confused about where that derivative acts.

Then I used the chain rule to get:

EQUATION 4
<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=y&#039;\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}\frac{d}{dx}y&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039;<br />
No, What you want to do is add and subtract

\frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} y&#039; \right) = \left(\frac{d}{dx} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} \right) y&#039; + \frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} y&#039;&#039;

from the RHS of (*):

<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=\left(\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}\right)y&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039; + \frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} y&#039; \right) - \left(\frac{d}{dx} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} \right) y&#039; - \frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} y&#039;&#039;<br />

and simplify.
 
fzero said:
<br /> \frac{df}{dx}=\left(\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}\right)y&#039;+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;}y&#039;&#039; + \frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} y&#039; \right) - \left(\frac{d}{dx} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} \right) y&#039; - \frac{\partial f}{\partial y&#039;} y&#039;&#039;<br />

and simplify.

Where did
$$
\frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} y' \right)
$$
this piece come from?
 
Dustinsfl said:
Where did
$$
\frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'} y' \right)
$$
this piece come from?

We're adding 0 to the equation that I called (*), in the form of the identity for the total derivative of ##\partial f/\partial y'##. The last 3 terms in the equation that you quoted cancel amongst themselves.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K