Derivation of Fowler-Nordheim current density

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the Fowler-Nordheim current density, specifically in the context of electron tunneling across a triangular barrier in solid-state electronics. Participants seek a detailed mathematical derivation of the formula for current density, as well as clarification on specific components of the derivation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a need for a full, detailed derivation of the Fowler-Nordheim current density formula, citing existing resources as insufficient.
  • Another participant suggests checking the original Fowler-Nordheim paper for the derivation, indicating that it may contain relevant information.
  • Concerns are raised about the origin of the F^2 term in the current density expression, with a request for clarification on this aspect.
  • One participant mentions that the effective field F is typically defined in relation to the potential and the effective length of the triangular barrier.
  • A later reply indicates that the derivation is considered tricky and may not be readily available, suggesting that it took significant effort to derive.
  • Several participants express interest in obtaining the derivation or related information, indicating a collaborative effort to share resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the availability of a complete derivation of the Fowler-Nordheim current density. Multiple views are presented regarding the sources of information and the complexity of the derivation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that standard symbols and definitions may vary, which could affect the interpretation of the equations involved. The discussion highlights the dependence on specific definitions and the challenges in deriving the current density formula.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers and students in solid-state electronics, particularly those studying electron tunneling and related phenomena, may find this discussion relevant.

zeus_the_almighty
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
I study solid-state electronics, more precisely electron Fowler-Nordheim tunneling across the gate oxide of a Silicon-Oxide-Silicon capacitor.
I need help on the physics of electron tunneling across a triangular barrier.
It will be part of my PhD dissertation. I have been through many websites but couldn't find out any FULL, DETAILED, derivation of the so-called Fowler-Nordheim Current density. Looks like nobody knows exactly the math which lies behind!

Does anybody know how to derive the well-known formula of the Fowler-Nordheim current density resulting
from a triangular potential barrier, which is:

(E.1) J_{FN}=\alpha F^2 \exp{\frac{-\beta}{F}}

where \alpha and \beta are the so-called pre-exponential and exponential Fowler-Nordheim parameters, and F the electrical field across the tunnel oxide.
\alpha and \beta depend on the potential barrier height \Phi_{0} and the ratio of effectives masses (in the oxide conduction band and in the silicon conduction band) in the following way:

(E.2) \alpha=\frac{q^3}{8\pi qh\Phi_{0}}\frac{m_{Si}}{m_{ox}}

and

(E.3) \beta=\frac{8\pi}{3qh}\sqrt{2m_{ox}}(q\Phi_{0})^\frac{3}{2}

I know part of the derivation but there are some missing steps.
Here are a few hints for those who may help me:
the current density J_{FN} can be expressed as the product of:
i)
the number of electrons per unit area and time arriving at the Silicon/oxide interface,

and

ii)the tunneling probability T(E) for a triangular barrier.

From the above, and some straightforward homogeneity considerations, one finds out:

(E.4) J_{FN}=\frac{q}{m} \int_{0}^{E_{m}} n(E) f(E) T(E) dE

where n(E) is the density of states per unit energy,
f(E) the Fermi-Dirac function,
Em the highest energy of the electron gas.

Since we consider only cold emission, f(E)=1 .

Moreover, if the electrons are thought of as a free electron gas, the density of states per unit energy does not depend on the energy and is expressed (classicaly) as:

(E.5) n(E)=\frac{2\pi m^*}{h^3}

In addition to this, the tunneling probability, "seen" by an electron arriving at the Silicon/oxide interface with an energy "E", and resulting from a triangular barrier (whose height is q\phi_{0}-E and electric field F) can be derived easily in solving the steady-state one-dimensional Schrödinger equation, giving:

(E.6) T(E)=\exp{(-\frac{8\pi}{3qh}\sqrt{2m_{ox}(q\Phi_{0}-E) }\frac{1}{F})}.

From, this, the question is:

How does one go from:

(E.7)J_{FN}=\frac{q}{m} \int_{0}^{E_{m}} \frac{2\pi m^*}{h^3} T(E) dE

to (E.1)?

THANKS.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have the paper here with me, but I could have sworn that the current density was derived in the original paper. Have you checked that?

There is a condensed derivation of that here...

http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~bart/book/msfield.htm

Zz.
 
Thank u for your answer.
I have already been checking this site.
The derivation described there only gives you
the tunneling probability T(E) but does NOT give the FULL derivation
of the current density J_{FN}.

The one thing which really puzzles me is:
where does F^2 come from in the expression of J_{FN}?

Help!
 
zeus_the_almighty said:
Thank u for your answer.
I have already been checking this site.
The derivation described there only gives you
the tunneling probability T(E) but does NOT give the FULL derivation
of the current density J_{FN}.

The one thing which really puzzles me is:
where does F^2 come from in the expression of J_{FN}?

Help!

Then you REALLY need to read the original Fowler-Nordheim paper since there are some "standard" symbols associated with most of these variables. F is typically defined as the "effective field", i.e. phi/L, where phi is the potential and "L" is the effective length of the triangular barrier.

If you can't get hold of FN's paper, you may want to check out Kevin Jensen's extension of this work. See

K.L. Jensen, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B, v.21, p.1528 (2003).

Good luck!

Zz.
 
Thank u Zz.
What are you doing?
Which field of physics?
I am finishing my PhD dissertation entitled:
"Modeling and Study of Tunnel oxide degradation of EEPROM Cells".
I will defend it on December 17th, 2004.
I've got a lot of work.


It's 7p.m. in Marseilles.
Gotta go home Now.

See u later on.
 
zeus_the_almighty said:
Thank u Zz.
What are you doing?
Which field of physics?

My career in physics is well-documented in one of my journal entries on here, so there's no need to occupy more space than necessary to bore everyone else. You're welcome to browse it.

Zz.
 
I know I am six years too late ;-)

But I have the proof, I got it from my professor. He told me exactly the same that you can not find the derivation anywhere, it is kind of tricky and he sat a while until he derived it.

So if you should still need it just contact me.
 
Hello divB:
I am interested in the derivation.
LydiaAC
 
Hi diVB and LydiaAC,

Could anyone of you send me a copy? Thanks a lot.

sifangyou4
 
  • #10
Hello, I'm studying they Fowler-Nordheim equations now and would love to get the information as well. hopefully every body's still around.

Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K