Derivation of Partial Derivatives in a Textbook: Understanding the Factor of 1/2

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a derivation involving partial derivatives as presented in a textbook. Participants are focused on understanding the appearance of a factor of 1/2 in the context of differentiating terms related to the function tau.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the differentiation of terms and question the source of the factor of 1/2. Some attempt to clarify the differentiation process, while others express uncertainty about the cancellation of factors during the derivation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. There is an ongoing exploration of the differentiation steps and their implications, but no consensus has been reached regarding the factor of 1/2.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a textbook derivation and are attempting to reconcile their understanding with the presented material. There is a noted uncertainty about the differentiation process and its outcomes.

Luminous Blob
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to follow a derivation in given in a textbook. Part of this derivation goes like this:

[tex]\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{1}{c}\frac{dx}{ds}\right)=c\left(\frac{\partial^2\tau}{\partial x^2}\frac{\partial \tau}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial^2\tau}{\partial x \partial y}\frac{\partial \tau}{\partial y}\right)[/tex]
[tex]=\frac{c}{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left[\left(\frac{\partial \tau}{\partial x}\right )^2 + \left (\frac {\partial \tau}{\partial y}\right )^2 \right][/tex]

I worked through that and came up with the same answer, but without the factor of 1/2. Can anyone tell me where it comes from?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Differentiate out those last terms...

d/dx(d tau/dx)^2=2d tau/dx * (d^2 tau/dx^2)
 
Ah, gotcha! Thanks :)
 
Hang on, after looking at it a bit more I'm not so sure...wouldn't that give you a factor of 2 out the front rather than 1/2?
 
Luminous Blob said:
Hang on, after looking at it a bit more I'm not so sure...wouldn't that give you a factor of 2 out the front rather than 1/2?

Doesn't performing the differentiation in the bottom line result in the top line, since the 2 cancels the 1/2?

If it does, then isn't everything OK?

Regards,
George
 
Yep - the '2' in my previous post cancels with the '2' of Blob's last term, giving the middle term...
 
Haha, I see now...as you may have noticed, I'm not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed :)

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K