Derivation of Potential Energy for Multi-Particle Systems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of potential energy for multi-particle systems as presented in 'Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach' by J. Jose. The author introduces the total change in kinetic energy using the equation involving net external forces (Fi) and internal forces (Fij). A point of confusion arises when the author changes the order of summation and integration, leading to a potential misinterpretation of the bounds of integration. The consensus among participants is that the change in order may indeed introduce an error due to differing bounds for each integral in the summation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with vector calculus
  • Knowledge of multi-particle systems dynamics
  • Experience with integral calculus and summation notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of kinetic energy in multi-particle systems
  • Study the implications of changing the order of integration and summation
  • Explore potential energy formulations in classical mechanics
  • Investigate common mistakes in vector calculus related to bounds of integration
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics and dynamics, as well as educators seeking to clarify complex concepts in multi-particle systems.

AcidRainLiTE
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
I am reading 'Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach' by J. Jose, and I am confused about a step in the author's development of potential energy for a system of many particles.

He begins by writing down a term equivalent to the total change in kinetic energy of the system:

\sum_i \int_{x_{i0}}^{x_{if}}\left( \bf{F_i} + \sum_j{\bf{F_{ij}}}\right) \cdot d\bf{x_i}

where Fi is the net external force acting on particle i and Fij is internal force exerted by particle j on particle i.

He examines this integral in two parts: that due to the external forces and that due to the internal forces. After dealing with the first term (external forces), he then says that if the order of summation and integration over i is changed, the second term becomes

\int_{x_{i0}}^{x_{if}} \sum_{i,j}{\bf{F_{ij}}} \cdot d\bf{x_i}.

It looks like he brought the summation over i inside the integral, but this does not make any sense because the index i still persists in the bounds of the integral (which is outside the summation). Or to put it another way, in the original integral (with the summation over i outside the integral), the bounds are different in each integral in the summation, so you cannot just combine all the integrals into a single integral. What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your observation is correct, there must be a mistake
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K