Undergrad Derivation of Riemann tensor's first order-equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Riemann
Click For Summary
The Riemann tensor's first-order equation in terms of the perturbation metric ##h_{\mu\nu}## is derived from Schutz's second edition, specifically using the metric equation ##g_{\alpha \beta}=\eta_{\alpha \beta}+h_{\alpha\beta}##. The derivation involves substituting this metric into the Christoffel symbols and then into the curvature components, retaining only linear terms in ##h##. The confusion regarding the order arises from the fact that while the equation contains second-order derivatives of ##h##, it is considered first order in ##h## because the perturbation itself and its derivatives are small. This approach allows for the neglect of higher-order terms in ##h##. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly interpreting the derivation and its implications in general relativity.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
TL;DR
Trying to derive Eq. (8.25) for Riemann tensor in the book of Schutz's in GR.
According to Schutz's second edition book, the equation for Riemann tensor to first order in ##h_{\mu\nu}## is:

$$R_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}= \frac{1}{2}(h_{\alpha \nu,\beta \mu}+h_{\beta\mu,\alpha\nu}-h_{\alpha\mu,\beta \nu}-h_{\beta \nu , \alpha \mu})$$
which (as stated in the book) can be derived easily by using Eq. (8.12) which is:

$$g_{\alpha \beta}=\eta_{\alpha \beta}+h_{\alpha\beta}$$
All this is covered in pages 189-192.

How to derive the above identity? and how to derive the n-th order in ##h_{\mu\nu}## equation for Riemann tensor?
How come this equation is of first order in ##h_{\mu\nu}## if the terms in the above equation are second order derivatives of ##h##.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is first order in ##h## (and its derivatives), not in the order of the derivatives. The assumption is that ##h## and its derivatives are small and you ignore terms that are of higher order in ##h##. The derivation is just inserting your metric into the expression for the Christoffel symbols (keeping only terms linear in ##h##) and then inserting the expression for the Christoffel symbols into the expression for the curvature components in terms of the Christoffel symbols (again, keeping only terms linear in ##h##).
 
  • Like
Likes MathematicalPhysicist
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K