I Derivation of the Canonical Ensemble

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the canonical ensemble, emphasizing the relationship between microstates and macrostates in statistical thermodynamics. It explains that a system in contact with a heat reservoir reaches thermal equilibrium at temperature T, where the energy of the system and reservoir are interdependent. The number of microstates of the total system is derived from the microstates of the reservoir, leading to the canonical partition function. A key point is the clarification that each microstate corresponds uniquely to a specific energy level, countering the notion that a microstate could relate to multiple energy states. The conclusion reinforces that changes in the system's energy directly influence the available microstates, establishing a clear one-to-one relationship.
Dario56
Messages
289
Reaction score
48
One of the common derivations of the canonical ensemble goes as follows:

Assume there is a system of interest in the contact with heat reservoir which together form an isolated system. Heat can be exchanged between the system and reservoir until thermal equilibrium is established and both are at temperature ##T##.

Suppose system of interest is in microstate ##i## and that it has energy ##E_{i}##, energy of the reservoir is than defined as ##E_R = E - E_i##. In the last equation ##E## is the energy of the total isolated system which must be constant.

We want to determine the number of microstates of the total isolated system in which the system of interest is in microstate ##i## or the probability that isolated system will be in such a state. Number of such microstates is denoted as ##\Omega_i(E)## and is equal to the number of microstates of the reservoir ##\Omega_R(E - E_i)## since the system of interest is in particular microstate ##i##.

Total number of microstates of the isolated system is defined as: $$\Omega (E) = \sum_{i=1} \Omega_R(E - E_i)$$

that is, it is equal to sum of the number of the reservoir microstates over every microstate of the system of interest ##i##.

Not going further into the derivation, number of microstates and probability mentioned previously are given by: $$\Omega_R(E - E_i) = \Omega_R(E)e^{- \beta E_i}$$ $$ P_i = \frac {e^{-\beta E_i}} {\sum_{j=1}^N e^{-\beta E_j}} $$

where the denominator of the previous equation is the canonical partition function ##Z##and ##N## is the number of the microstates in which the system can be.Now, we come to my question.

According to the notation given, microstate of the system ##i## is determined by the system's energy ##E_i##.

However, we know that the task of statistical thermodynamics is to connect macrostate of the system with microstates in which it can be found. Energy of the system is its macrostate and therefore such a macrostate is compatible with many different microstates in which system may be.

Because of this, energy of the system ##E_i## can't depend only on particular microstate ##i## since the same microstate can be compatible with more than one energy of the system.

In another words, for any ## i## there may be more than one term in the partition function. However, equation form of the partition function doesn't allow more than one term for each microstate.
 
Science news on Phys.org
One should keep in mind, that the sum in ##\Omega (E_{total}) = \sum_{n=1} \Omega_R(E_{total}- E_n)## is over all the states of the system of interest, ##S##, rather than over the energy levels of ##S##. In the latter case, one would have to include a factor of ##\Omega_S(E_n)## in the sum to take into account the degeneracy of states with energy ##E_n##.

See: "Statistical Physics" by David Tong

Statistical Physics - DAMTP

 
That's why the usual derivation goes like
$$\Omega(E)=\Omega_1(E_1) \Omega_2(E_2)=\Omega_1(E_1) \Omega_2(E-E_1).$$
Then define the entropy
$$S=\ln \Omega(E)=k \ln \Omega_1(E_1) + k \ln \Omega_2(E-E_1).$$
The most probable state is given by the maximum of the entropy, i.e., for
$$1/T_1=\frac{\partial \Omega_1(E_1)}{\partial E_1} = 1/T_2=\left [\frac{\partial \Omega_2(E_2)}{\partial E_2} \right]_{E_2=E-E_1}.$$
That's the "zeroth Law" introducing temperature as a thermodynamical variable of state.

Now we consider the probability for the system of interest to have one of its possible energies ##E_1##. This probability is proportional to the number of microstates of system 2 with energy ##E-E_1## times the degeneracy factor of ##E_1##, which however is just an overall factor, all of which we lump into a common factor ##C##,
$$P(E_1)=C \Omega_2(E-E_1).$$
Expanding the logarithm of this gives
$$\ln P(E_1)=\ln C +\ln \Omega_2(E) -E_1/T=C'-E_1/T$$
and thus
$$P(E_1)=\frac{1}{Z} \exp(-E_1/T), \quad Z=\sum_{E_1} \exp(-E_1/T).$$
 
Lord Jestocost said:
One should keep in mind, that the sum in ##\Omega (E_{total}) = \sum_{n=1} \Omega_R(E_{total}- E_n)## is over all the states of the system of interest, ##S##, rather than over the energy levels of ##S##. In the latter case, one would have to include a factor of ##\Omega_S(E_n)## in the sum to take into account the degeneracy of states with energy ##E_n##.

See: "Statistical Physics" by David Tong

Statistical Physics - DAMTP

Yes, I think this question is clear now. What confused me is that I thought that microstate ##i## can be compatible with more than one energy state of system of interest ##E_i##. This really has no sense since microstate is an instantaneous configuration of particles over available energy states.

If energy of the system of interest changes, so do the available energy states of the particles which means that for every energy of the system of interest there is a unique set of microstates in which system may be.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top