Derivation of the Lorentz force, QM

ag_swe
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Studying in the Heisenberg picture, we have

[itex]\frac{\text{d}x_i}{\text{d}t}=-\frac{\text{i}}{\hbar}[x_i,H]=\frac{1}{m}\left(p_i-\frac{q}{c}A_i\right)[/itex]

where the last bracket is known as the kinematic momentum [itex]\pi[/itex]. Now, to find [itex]\frac{\text{d}^2{\bf{x}}}{\text{d}t^2}[/itex] I do the following:

[itex]\frac{\text{d}^2{\bf{x}}}{\text{d}t^2} = [\frac{\text{d}{\bf{x}}}{\text{d}t},H]<br /> =[\frac{\pi}{m},\frac{\pi^2}{2m}+q\Phi]=[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\pi}{m}(\frac{\pi^2}{2m}+q\Phi)-(\frac{\pi^2}{2m}+q\Phi)\frac{\pi}{m}=[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\pi}{m}q\Phi-q\Phi\frac{\pi}{m}=[/itex]

[itex]\frac{q}{m}(-\text{i}\hbar\nabla-\frac{q}{c}{\bf{A}})\Phi-\frac{q}{m}\Phi(-\text{i}\hbar\nabla-\frac{q}{c}{\bf{A}})[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\text{i}\hbar q}{m}{\bf{E}}-\frac{q^2}{mc}{\bf{A}}\Phi+\frac{\text{i}\hbar q}{m}\Phi \nabla+\frac{q^2}{mc}\Phi {\bf{A}}=?[/itex]

The correct expression should be

[itex]\frac{\text{d}^2{\bf{x}}}{\text{d}t^2} =\frac{q}{m}[{\bf{E}}+\frac{1}{2c}(\frac{\text{d}{\bf{x}}}{t} \times {\bf{B}}-{\bf{B}} \times \frac{\text{d}{\bf{x}}}{t})][/itex]

My expression should be multiplied with the constant [itex]-\text{i}/\hbar[/itex], so at least the electric field term in my expression is correct. But how do I transform the rest into the wanted expression?
 
on Phys.org
Use
[tex]m\frac{dv_{i}}{dt} = im[H , v_{i}] + m\frac{\partial v_{i}}{\partial t}[/tex]

then write
[tex]H = \frac{1}{2}m \sum_{k}v_{k}v_{k} + q \phi[/tex]

Now
[tex] [H , v_{i}] = \frac{m}{2}\sum_{k} \{v_{k}[v_{k}, v_{i}] + [v_{k} , v_{i}] v_{k}\} + \frac{q}{m}[\phi , p_{i}][/tex]

Next use the operator equation (try to prove it!)
[tex][v_{i},v_{k}] = i \frac{q}{m^{2}}\epsilon_{ikj}B_{j}[/tex]
where
[tex]B_{j}= (\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{A})_{j}[/tex]
Notice that
[tex]m\frac{\partial v_{i}}{\partial t} = - q \frac{\partial A_{i}}{\partial t}[/tex]
Put every thing together and you will get the Lorentz force operator. Can you now see your mistakes?

Sam
 
Thank you very much. Very appreciated! However, I didn't get how to find the two vector products without "looking into the future", i.e., knowing what I was looking for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K