Derivation of the potential of a charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the electric potential of a point charge as a function of distance from the charge. The original poster is exploring the integral setup for this calculation and is questioning the limits of integration, particularly the choice between zero and infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up an integral to calculate electric potential but encounters a division by zero issue. They consider changing the lower limit of integration from zero to infinity and question the implications of this choice.
  • Another participant clarifies the definition of potential in the context of electric fields and suggests integrating from the distance to infinity, providing a potential expression.
  • Subsequent posts raise questions about the implications of positive and negative potentials on work done when moving charges in an electric field.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts of electric potential and the implications of their definitions. Clarifications have been offered regarding the integration limits and the relationship between potential and work done on charges. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of positive and negative potentials without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the choice of reference points for potential, specifically the implications of setting potential to zero at infinity versus at the location of the charge. The conversation also touches on the nature of work done by electric fields and the forces involved when moving charges.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


I'm facing an extremely easy problem (well, I set it up myself) that I can't even solve!
I want to calculate the electric potential of a charge q in function of d, the distance from it.

I let 0 be the point where the charge is.
[tex]\varphi (d) - \varphi (0) = - \int _0^d \frac{kq \vec r}{r^3} \cdot d \vec r=-k q \int _0^d \frac{dr}{r^2}[/tex] and I would divide by zero if I continue.
So I realize that instead of the 0 in the lower integral limit, why should I put [tex]\infty[/tex]? After all, it's not like setting the potential energy as 0 at infinity. I'm dealing with the electrostatic potential and not the potential energy (although they differ by a multiplicative constant in the static case).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential at position r is defined as the work done by the field when a positive unit charge moves from r to the point where the potential is zero. In case of a point charge, we choose zero potential at infinity, so you have to integral from d to infinity.

[tex] \varphi (d) - \varphi (\infty)= - \int _d^{\infty} \frac{kq \vec r}{r^3} \cdot d \vec r=-k q \int _d^{\infty} \frac{dr}{r^2}=\frac{kq }{d}[/tex]

ehild
 
Thanks once again ehild, for the nice clarification/explanation.
 
Last question I hope: if the potential is positive, does that mean I have to do work to "push" the charge from r to infinity? And if the potential is negative, I don't have to do any work, rather the charge will do work and will get farer and farer?
 
I copy my previous sentence :

"The potential at position r is defined as the work done by the field when a positive unit charge moves from r to the point where the potential is zero. In case of a point charge, we choose zero potential at infinity"

If the potential is positive (like in the case around a positive point charge U=kQ/r) the work of the field is positive when the positive unit charge moves toward infinity. Around a negative point charge, the potential is negative (because of the negative value of the charge), so the field does negative work if a positive unit charge moves to infinity, and this work decreases its kinetic energy. The KE never is negative. The positive charge can go away from a negative one if it has some initial KE or there is some other force balancing the electric field.

When you move a charged particle in an electric field, there are two kinds of forces: The electric force and your force. The electric force is well-defined, you can find out that it is conservative, it has potential. Your force is as you like it (with limits, of course) you can not define the electric field by your force.
Moreover: A particle does not do work on itself, it is the force that does the work.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K