Derivation of the wave equation satisfied by E and B

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the wave equation satisfied by the electric field E and magnetic field B in a medium characterized by a polarization vector P that depends on position and time. The original poster begins with Maxwell's equations and attempts to manipulate them to arrive at a wave equation for E.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the wave equation by taking the curl of Maxwell's equations and simplifying them, leading to an expression involving the divergence of E and the polarization vector P. Some participants question the validity of the simplifications made during this process.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's derivation, pointing out potential errors and clarifying the implications of the charge density in the context of the problem. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding the divergence of E and the nature of the charge density in the medium.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted distinction between free charge density and bound charge density, which is critical to the discussion. The original poster is encouraged to reconsider their assumptions about the divergence of E based on the provided conditions of the medium.

pcflores
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



given a medium in which p=0, j=0 but where the polarization vector P=P(r,t). Derive the wave equation satisfied by E and B.

Homework Equations


i started with the 4 basic Maxwells equations
∇ · D = ρ (1)
∇ · B = 0 (2)
∇ × E = −∂B/∂t (3)
∇ × H = J + ∂D/∂t (4)

and with the relation
D = ɛE + P (5)
H = 1/µB + M (6)

The Attempt at a Solution



i took the curl of both sides of 3 and simplified both sides and got the eqaution
laplacian of E = µ∂H/∂t (7)
i assumed that M=0 --> B=µH
taking the curl of both sides of (7) and using (4)
curl of (laplacian of E) = (µ∂/∂t)∂(∇ × D)/∂t (8)

substituting (5) to (8)
laplacian of E = (µɛ∂/∂t)∂E/∂t + µ∂/∂t)∂P/∂t (9)


my final answer is for the wave equation of E is (9), i want to know if my answer is correct before trying to solve Bthank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pcflores said:
i took the curl of both sides of 3 and simplified both sides and got the eqaution
laplacian of E = µ∂H/∂t (7)

That doesn't look right, how did you "simplify" the curls?
 
Goddar said:
That doesn't look right, how did you "simplify" the curls?
hm.. i might have written the wrong thing in my post but here is my handwritten solution
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2923.jpg
    DSCN2923.jpg
    28.1 KB · Views: 531
  • DSCN2923.jpg
    DSCN2923.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 537
Yeah there's a problem because the divergence of E is not zero here, only the divergence of D...
 
Goddar said:
Yeah there's a problem because the divergence of E is not zero here, only the divergence of D...

yes thank you

i reworked that part of the solution

divergene of E = (1/epsilon) divergence of (D - P)
= (1/epsilon) {divergence of D - divergence of P}
= 1/epsilon (p_free - (-p_bound))
since p_free + p_bound = p , and it is given that p = 0
thus divergence of E = 0

is that the only correction?
 
Well, your statement says that you are given a medium in which ρ = 0 but in general the charge density you are given is the free one (i.e. ρfree) because this is the one you can control in an experiment.
This would make ∇⋅E = –∇⋅P/ε = ρbound≠ 0
 
Goddar said:
Well, your statement says that you are given a medium in which ρ = 0 but in general the charge density you are given is the free one (i.e. ρfree) because this is the one you can control in an experiment.
This would make ∇⋅E = –∇⋅P/ε = ρbound≠ 0

oh ok i get it now. ill rework my whole solution
 
Goddar said:
Well, your statement says that you are given a medium in which ρ = 0 but in general the charge density you are given is the free one (i.e. ρfree) because this is the one you can control in an experiment.
This would make ∇⋅E = –∇⋅P/ε = ρbound≠ 0
thank you very much by the way
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K