Derivation with logarithms and product

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the function y = (1/ax)ax, focusing on the application of logarithmic differentiation and the product rule. Participants explore the steps involved in differentiating the function and express uncertainty about specific aspects of the derivation process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion over the application of the product rule in differentiating -ax ln(ax), questioning whether the derivative of ln(ax) should be ln(a) or something else.
  • One participant suggests that the derivation simplifies if the property ln(a^x) = x ln(a) is used.
  • Another participant attempts to clarify the differentiation of ln(ax) and proposes that v = ln(ax) leads to dv/dx being ln(a), but struggles with the implications of this on the overall differentiation.
  • There is a correction regarding the use of a denominator in the differentiation process, indicating a potential oversight in the original example.
  • A participant points out that "derivate" is not the correct term in mathematics, suggesting the proper terminology should be "differentiate" or "find the derivative."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct application of the product rule and the differentiation of ln(ax). Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of derivatives and the use of logarithmic properties.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the proper differentiation of ln(ax) and the implications of using logarithmic identities. Some participants express uncertainty about the steps involved in the derivation, indicating potential missing assumptions or misunderstandings.

Elias Waranoi
Messages
45
Reaction score
2
I went through an example question that showed me how to solve the question but I'm not sure if I've misunderstood something or if they did a mistake.

Question: Derivate y = (1/ax)ax

ln(y) = ln( (1/ax)ax ) = ax( ln(1) - ln(ax) ) = -ax ln(ax)
(1/y)(dy/dx) = -ax * ax ln(a) - a * ln(ax)
dy/dx = (1/ax)ax * (-ax * ax ln(a) - a * ln(ax))

I think that they are derivating -ax ln(ax) as a product of two functions with u*(dv/dx) + v*(du/dx) where u = -ax and v = ln(ax). But isn't (dv/dx) supposed to be only ln(a)? So dy/dx = (1/ax)ax * (-ax * ln(a) - a * ln(ax))
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mesmart
Physics news on Phys.org
Elias Waranoi said:
I went through an example question that showed me how to solve the question but I'm not sure if I've misunderstood something or if they did a mistake.

Question: Derivate y = (1/ax)ax

ln(y) = ln( (1/ax)ax ) = ax( ln(1) - ln(ax) ) = -ax ln(ax)
(1/y)(dy/dx) = -ax * ax ln(a) - a * ln(ax)
dy/dx = (1/ax)ax * (-ax * ax ln(a) - a * ln(ax))

I think that they are derivating -ax ln(ax) as a product of two functions with u*(dv/dx) + v*(du/dx) where u = -ax and v = ln(ax). But isn't (dv/dx) supposed to be only ln(a)? So dy/dx = (1/ax)ax * (-ax * ln(a) - a * ln(ax))

Your derivation simplifies a lot if you use the fact that ln(a^x) = x ln(a)
 
Elias Waranoi said:
I went through an example question that showed me how to solve the question but I'm not sure if I've misunderstood something or if they did a mistake.

Question: Derivate y = (1/ax)ax

ln(y) = ln( (1/ax)ax ) = ax( ln(1) - ln(ax) ) = -ax ln(ax)
(1/y)(dy/dx) = -ax * ax ln(a) - a * ln(ax)
dy/dx = (1/ax)ax * (-ax * ax ln(a) - a * ln(ax))

I think that they are derivating -ax ln(ax) as a product of two functions with u*(dv/dx) + v*(du/dx) where u = -ax and v = ln(ax).
Yes.
But isn't (dv/dx) supposed to be only ln(a)? So dy/dx = (1/ax)ax * (-ax * ln(a) - a * ln(ax))
No.

Try to differentiate ##\ln a^x## step by step.
What is ##\frac{d}{dx}\ln f(x)## and how do you differentiate ##f(x)=a^x##?

Hint: You can write ##f(x)=a^x=\exp(\ln a^x)=\exp(x\ln a)##.
 
But isn't v = ln(ax) = x ln(a)
dv/dx = ln(a)

I can get that dv/dx is ax ln(a) if v = ax so:
v = ax -> ln(v) = ln(ax) = x ln(a)
(1/v)(dv/dx) = ln(a) -> dv/dx = v ln(a) = ax ln(a)

But v = ln(ax) so I can't get anything but ln(a)
 
Elias Waranoi said:
But isn't v = ln(ax) = x ln(a)
dv/dx = ln(a)

I can get that dv/dx is ax ln(a) if v = ax so:
v = ax -> ln(v) = ln(ax) = x ln(a)
(1/v)(dv/dx) = ln(a) -> dv/dx = v ln(a) = ax ln(a)

But v = ln(ax) so I can't get anything but ln(a)
You're right. I first mistakenly forgot a denominator. Maybe the author you have your example from made the same mistake.
 
Elias Waranoi said:
Question: Derivate y = (1/ax)ax
Although "derivate" is a word in English, it is not used in mathematics. To obtain the derivative of a function, you differentiate it or find its derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Elias Waranoi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K