I am reading a recent (2003) paper, "Fatou and Julia Sets of Quadratic Polynomials" by Jerelyn T. Watanabe. A superattracting fixed point is a fixed point where the derivative is zero. The polynomial P(z) = z(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); ^{2}has fixed points P(0) = 0 and P(∞) = ∞ (note we are working in [itex]\hat{\mathbb{C}} = \mathbb{C}\cup\infty[/itex]). The derivative at 0 is P'(0) = 0. The author then writes "the derivative of P at ∞ is given by 1/P'(1/ζ) = ζ/2. Evaluating at ζ = 0 gives P'(∞) = 0."

What's going on here? We seem to have conjugated P' by the Mobius map [itex]\zeta\mapsto1/\zeta[/itex]. Why? I would think, if anything, we'd have to conjugate P itself, in order to find properties of P...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Derivative at infinity on the Riemann sphere

Loading...

Similar Threads for Derivative infinity Riemann | Date |
---|---|

I Partial derivatives in thermodynamics | Mar 27, 2018 |

I Deriving a function from within an integral with a known solution | Mar 23, 2018 |

I Derivative and Parameterisation of a Contour Integral | Feb 7, 2018 |

Does the function f(x)=infinity(x) have a derivative? | Nov 29, 2010 |

Derivative of infinity | Mar 11, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**