Derivative in cylindrical coordinates.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around taking derivatives in cylindrical coordinates, particularly in the context of uniform circular motion. Participants explore the differences between rectangular and cylindrical coordinate systems, focusing on the implications for velocity and acceleration in such scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while the position vector in rectangular coordinates is straightforward, they seek a direct method for taking derivatives in cylindrical coordinates.
  • Another participant points out that while the absolute value of acceleration remains constant in uniform circular motion, the direction of the unit vector changes over time, suggesting the need to differentiate the unit vector in the radial direction.
  • A participant clarifies that in cylindrical coordinates, the unit vectors are not constant, and provides a general formula for the derivative of the position vector.
  • It is mentioned that for circular motion, since the magnitude is constant, only the derivative of the unit vector contributes to the velocity.
  • One participant verifies the expression for the time derivative of the unit vector in terms of angular velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to account for the changing direction of unit vectors in cylindrical coordinates, but there is no consensus on the best method to take derivatives directly in this system. Some aspects of the discussion remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of transitioning between coordinate systems and the implications for understanding motion, particularly in terms of angular velocity and acceleration. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the treatment of angular quantities in different coordinate systems.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
This is calculus question, but I don't think calculus really cover this topic in either multi-variables or even vector calculus classes. This is really more common problem in electrodynamics.

Let R be position vector that trace out a circle or radius a with constant velocity. In rectangular coordinates:

[tex]\vec R = \hat x acos \omega t +\hat y a sin\omega t[/tex]

[tex]\vec v = \frac {d\vec R}{dt}= -\hat x a\omega sin \omega t +\hat y a\omega cos\omega t[/tex]This is very straight forward. So I am going to try to do the derivative in cylindrical coordinates. For cylindrical coordinates;

[tex]\vec R =\hat r a[/tex]

How do you take the derivative? There is only a constant. I know [tex]\vec v=\hat {\phi} a\omega[/tex]

The only way I know how to get v in cylindrical coordinates is doing a translation of v from rectangular coordinates to cylindrical coordinate after performing the derivative in rectangular coordinates.

Anyone can tell me a direct method to take the derivative in cylindrical coordinates?

Also for constant angular velocity [itex]\omega[/itex], angular acceleration is supposed to be zero. But if you look at in rectangular coordinates:

[tex]\vec a = \frac {d \vec v}{dt} = -\hat x a \omega^2 cos \omega t \;-\; \hat y a\omega^2sin\omega t[/tex]

Obviously it is not zero, does this mean you don't look at this as angular velocity or acceleration, but instead, look at it as in straight line components x,y?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The absolute value of the acceleration would be constant for uniform circular motion as described, but wouldn't the unit vector be changing direction with respect to time. You'd need to find the time derivative of the unit vector in the r direction I think.
 
Thanks, that's what I suspect.

Anyone can help on the first part?
 
I am not sure what you call "the first part".
The idea is that in cylindrical coordinates the unit vectors are not constants, as suggested above.
The derivative of the position vector r is, in general
[tex]\frac{d \vec{r}}{dt}=\frac{d (r\hat{r})}{dt}= \hat{r} \frac{d r}{dt}+r \frac{d \hat{r}}{dt}[/tex]
For circular motion the magnitude r is constant so only the second term remains.
The derivative of the unit vector r is
[tex]\frac{d (\hat{r})}{dt}=\omega \hat{\theta}[/tex]
 
nasu said:
I am not sure what you call "the first part".
The idea is that in cylindrical coordinates the unit vectors are not constants, as suggested above.
The derivative of the position vector r is, in general
[tex]\frac{d \vec{r}}{dt}=\frac{d (r\hat{r})}{dt}= \hat{r} \frac{d r}{dt}+r \frac{d \hat{r}}{dt}[/tex]
For circular motion the magnitude r is constant so only the second term remains.
The derivative of the unit vector r is
[tex]\frac{d (\hat{r})}{dt}=\omega \hat{\theta}[/tex]

Thanks for the reply,

I just want to verify:

[tex]\hat r = \hat x\; cos\; \omega t + \hat y \;sin\;\omega t \; \Rightarrow \; \frac {d\hat r}{dt}= -\hat x\;\omega\; sin\; \omega t + \hat y\;\omega \;cos\;\omega t = \hat {\phi}\; \omega[/tex]

Thanks

Alan
 
I think it's OK.
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K