Derivative of a derivative (2nd derivative) at only ONE point

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arestes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative Point
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of functions that have a second derivative (or higher) defined only at a single isolated point, while possessing lower order derivatives in a neighborhood around that point. Participants explore examples, definitions, and implications related to differentiability and continuity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a function can have a second derivative at only one isolated point while having lower order derivatives in a neighborhood.
  • Another participant argues that a derivative at an isolated point is not possible without a differentiable curve in the surrounding neighborhood.
  • A different participant asserts that there are functions differentiable only at a single point, but questions whether such functions can be derivatives of other functions due to the constraints on discontinuities.
  • One example provided is the function f(x) = x²w(x), where w(x) is a Weierstrass function, which is continuous and differentiable at zero but not elsewhere.
  • A later reply suggests that integrating a continuous function could yield a function that is n times differentiable at a single point, indicating a potential method to construct such functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the possibility of having a second derivative at only one point, with some asserting it is not feasible while others provide examples that suggest it may be possible. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of such functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the fundamental theorem of calculus and the implications of continuity and differentiability, but do not fully resolve the mathematical conditions or assumptions necessary for their claims.

arestes
Messages
84
Reaction score
4
Hi there!

Yesterday, while giving the definition of n times differentiable function (of a real function of a single variable, although a generalization of it to R^n or more sophisticated spaces would be nice to consider too, so if this makes sense more generally please also consider it) at a point (which involves the existence of all the lower order derivatives in a neighborhood and only the nth derivative at that point) someone asked my teacher in class if there are functions that have nth derivative (n>1) at only one isolated point while the lower order derivatives exist at an entire neighborhood of it. This seems like a natural question after getting the definition he gave.

At first my teacher thought the matter was easy to resolve by exhibiting the Dirichlet function times the identity which only has a derivative at zero but this cannot be the derivative of any function since it has 1st order discontinuities (finite jumps).

Does there exist a function that has a derivative in an entire interval and second derivative at only one of its points? more generally, a function with 1, 2,... n-1 th derivatives defined at (probably nested) intervals and nth derivative only at one point inside?


I've been trying to figure it out myself to no avail... My teacher gave up too but he thinks he's seen it a long time ago and had to do with some class of functions for which the fundamental theorem of calculus does not hold (?)... I wouldn't trust him much :Dcheers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that derivative of an isolated point is not possible. We can have a derivative at a point only if we have a differentiable curve in its left and right neighborhood.
 
Hi Dharapmihir,

THERE ARE functions that are only differentiable in a single point and nowhere else (and they're even well defined for all the reals). The examples mentioned above are such functions. But because the functions that are derivatives of other functions cannot be completely arbitrary(they cannot have jump discontinuities), I cannot justify whether there exists or not a function that is the derivative of another one and is only differentiable at one point.
 
It obviously suffices to find a continuous function differentiable at only one point, since all continuous functions have antiderivatives. Consider the function f(x) = x2w(x), where w(x) is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_function" . This is clearly continuous, it is differentiable at 0 via a squeeze theorem argument (w(x) is bounded, and x2→0 faster than x), but is not differentiable anywhere else (for if it were, w(x) = f(x)/x2 would be differentiable there too).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Citan Uzuki! thanks! this really works... I'll try to see if this generalizes to nth order too... If I can't figure it out myself I might come back and ask...
thanks again!
 
Of course, If [tex]\int^x_c t^2 w(t) dt[/tex] is differentiable at all of R then it is continuous and I can just keep on integrating and have a function which is only n times differentiable at a single point. I think I'm done with this, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K