Derivative of Exponential Function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the derivative of exponential functions, particularly using the limit definition. Participants explore various definitions of the exponential function and the implications for calculating its derivative at zero.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the limit definition of the derivative for exponential functions, specifically the form "0/0" encountered in the limit.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the limit may appear as "0/0," the limit itself is not equal to that expression.
  • A participant suggests using the power series definition of the exponential function to resolve the limit issue.
  • Another participant discusses different methods of defining the exponential function, including defining it as the inverse of the natural logarithm and as a power series, noting that these definitions avoid the original question.
  • One participant elaborates on how the derivative of the exponential function can be expressed in terms of a constant that varies with the base of the exponential function.
  • There is a question about whether the constant mentioned is equivalent to the derivative evaluated at zero, leading to further clarification on the distinction between the two.
  • Another participant points out that the derivative of an exponential function is not always equal to one, emphasizing the dependence on the base of the function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of the derivative of exponential functions, with no consensus reached on a single approach or definition.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in the definitions of the exponential function and the conditions under which the derivative is evaluated, highlighting the dependence on the chosen definition of the exponential function.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in calculus, particularly in the properties and definitions of exponential functions and their derivatives, may find this discussion relevant.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
I am reading the about the derivative of an exponential function using the limit definition, but one step I don't quite understand: [itex]lim_{h\rightarrow0}\frac{a^h -1}{h} = f'(0)[/itex] Wouldn't that limit equal 0/0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Every derivative limit is of the form "0/0" but, of course, the limit itself is NOT "0/0".
 
Oh, yes, how could I be so foolish to forget. Well, what sort of algebraic manipulation am I to perform then?
 
Have you defined the exponential function as [itex]\sum\frac{z^n}{n!}[/itex]. If so, use that to prove the limit.
 
There's the rub! It depends, of course, upon how you define [itex]e^x[/itex].

Many modern Calculus texts first define [itex]ln(x)= \int_a^x dx/x[/itex] and then define [itex]e^x[/itex] as the inverse function so your question never arises. That's my preferred method.

Robert1986 suggests that you define [itex]e^x[/itex] as as power series. That's perfectly reasonable, and again, your question does not arise.

But it is probably most common to define [itex]a^x[/itex] by first defining [itex]a^n[/itex] by "a multiplied by itself n times" then extending to all real numbers by requiring that [itex]a^{n+m}= (a^n)(a^m)[/itex], [itex](a^n)^m= a^{mn}[/itex], and continuity. Using that definition, we have
[tex]\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}= \frac{a^{x+h}- a^x}{h}= \frac{a^xa^h- a^x}{h}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{a^x(a^h- 1)}{h}= a^x\frac{a^h- 1}{h}[/tex]

So that
[tex]\frac{da^x}{dx}= \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^{h+1}- a^x}{h}= a^x\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^h- 1}{h}[/tex]
is just [itex]C_aa^x[/itex] where [itex]C_a[/itex] is that limit.

It is easy to show that if 0< a< 1, then [itex]C_a[/itex] is negative, that [itex]C_2[/itex] is less than 1, that [itex]C_3[/itex] is greater than 1, and that [itex]C_a[/itex] continuously increases as a increases. That means that there must exist some value of a, between 2 and 3, such that [itex]C_a= 1[/itex] and we define "e" to be that value of a.

From [itex]\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{e^h- 1}{h}= 1[/itex] we can say that, for h close to 0, [itex]\frac{e^h- 1}{h}[/itex] is close to 1 so that [itex]e^h- 1[/itex] is close to h. Then [itex]e^h[/itex] is close to 1+ h and so e is close to [itex](1+ h)^{1/h}[/itex] which is common limit definition of e: [itex]e= \lim_{h\to 0}(1+ h)^{1/h}[/itex] or, taking n= 1/h, [itex]e= \lim_{n\to\infty} (1+ 1/n)^n[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@HallsOfIvy:

So this constant you are speaking about is the same as f'(0)?

Edit:

Also, the books says that this limit is the value of the derivative at zero. Why is that? And since the derivative of an exponential function itself, wouldn't that always be equal to one?
 
Last edited:
Bashyboy said:
@HallsOfIvy:

So this constant you are speaking about is the same as f'(0)?

It's not; f'(0) is the derivative of f(x) evaluated at x = 0. The constant Ca, in a way, turns out to be a "function" of a that changes the value of f'(0) depending on the value of a in f(x) = ax.

Edit:

Also, the books says that this limit is the value of the derivative at zero. Why is that? And since the derivative of an exponential function itself, wouldn't that always be equal to one?

If f(x) = ax, then the difference quotient for f(x) is[tex]\frac{a^{x+h} - a^x}{h} = a^x\frac{a^h - 1}{h}[/tex]
At x = 0, the difference quotient turns out to be (ah - 1)/h, and taking the limit as h→0 gives the derivative at 0, written as f'(0).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K