Derivative of Piece-Wise Function

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the differentiability of piece-wise functions at a specific point, x=1. For the first function, it is concluded that it is not differentiable at x=1 due to a lack of continuity, despite both one-sided derivatives being equal. The second function appears to be differentiable at x=1, as the left-hand and right-hand derivatives match, suggesting a smooth transition at that point. However, the presence of a "jagged edge" is noted as a potential concern for differentiability. Ultimately, it is emphasized that if a function is not continuous at a point, it cannot have a derivative there.
Jeremy
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I am doing my calculus homework and two problems are holding me up.

The first says:

Using one-sided derivatives, show that the function f(x) =

x^3, x_<_1
3x, x>1

does not have a derivative at x=1

Now it is painfully obvious that the function is not continuous at x=1. however, i am not entirely sure that is the answer that the book wants. the slopes from both sides seem to be 3, so how can it not have a derivative (aside from the continuity issue)? A similar (but with continuity) problem follows:



Secondly (i will try to answer the ones i have gotten so far):
let f(x) =

x^2, x_<_1
2x, x>1

a) find f'(x) for x<1......i think this is 2x
b) find f'(x) for x>1......2
c) find lim (x-->1-) f'(x)....2
d) find lim (x-->1+) f'(x)....2
e) does lim (x-->1) f'(x) exist? explain
f) use the def to find the left-hand derivative of f at x=1 if it exists...same as (c)=2
g) use the def...right-hand deriv...same as (d)=2
h) does f'(1) exist? explain

according to the rules of derivatives, if the left and right-hand derivatives are the same at a point, then that point has a derivative (assuming continuous). however, it seems to me that, at x=1, there would be a bit of a "jagged edge," somewhat like an absolute value point. therefore, how could a derivative be found?

thanks in advance. feel free to tell me i am horribly wrong in all aspects of my answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first question, an answer of it isn't differentiable because its not continuous seems to be the answer that would be appropriate to me.

2nd question, yes, it should be differentiable at f'(1). Because the slopes (derivatives) are the same at point x = 1, then it shouldn't have a "jagged egde". If it were graphed it should appear smooth, since the one sided limits of both the functions and derivatives have the same value at x=1.
 
sounds good

thanks a bunch
 
If there is no derivative at x = 1, which there isn't, then there can be no further derivatives at x = 1. There will be a "hole" in the graph of the derivative there. Therefore, the derivative is not differentiable at x = 1, even if both the left-hand and the right-hand derivatives exist and are the same.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
806
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
905
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
939
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K