Derive Wien's Law from Plancks Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mosaness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving Wien's Displacement Law from Planck's Law, specifically using the equation B(v,T) = \frac{2hv^3}{c^2(e^{\frac{hv}{kt}} - 1)}. The key steps involve simplifying Planck's Law by omitting constants that do not affect the position of maximum spectral radiance. The transformation from frequency to wavelength is essential, as Wien's Law relates wavelength to temperature. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly formatting mathematical notation for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's Law and its components (h, k, c)
  • Familiarity with Wien's Displacement Law
  • Basic knowledge of spectral radiance and its significance
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation, particularly TeX formatting
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Wien's Displacement Law from Planck's Law in detail
  • Learn about the implications of spectral radiance in thermodynamics
  • Explore the mathematical transformations between frequency and wavelength
  • Practice formatting mathematical equations using TeX for clarity in presentations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students studying thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the relationship between temperature and electromagnetic radiation will benefit from this discussion.

Mosaness
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
1. Derive Wien's displacement law from the Planck Spectrum.
2. Planck's Law: \frac{2hv<sup>3</sup>}{c<sup>2</sup>(e<sup>\frac{hv}{kt}</sup>-1)}

Where v = frequency;
c = speed of light;
h = Plank's constant
k = Boltzmann's constant

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the first thing I wanted to confirm was that this was in fact the correct equation which I was going to derive.

My first attempt would be to try and simplify this equation as much as I can, by plugging in c, and h. And because this gives out an incredibly small number, it can be disregarded as having not too big of an effect and can be represented by a 1, giving rise to:

\frac{v<sup>3</sup>}{(e<sup>\frac{hv}{kt}</sup>-1)}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to try re-typing this question. Some of the input didn't quite translate into mathematical notation.
 
Mosaness said:
1. Derive Wien's displacement law from the Planck Spectrum.



2. Planck's Law: \frac{2hv^3}{c^2(e^{\frac{hv}{kt}}<br /> -1)}

Where v = frequency;
c = speed of light;
h = Plank's constant
k = Boltzmann's constant

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, the first thing I wanted to confirm was that this was in fact the correct equation which I was going to derive.

My first attempt would be to try and simplify this equation as much as I can, by plugging in c, and h. And because this gives out an incredibly small number, it can be disregarded as having not too big of an effect and can be represented by a 1, giving rise to:

\frac{v^3}{(e^{]\frac{hv}{kt}}-1)}

A law states something so you should write Plank's Law as B(v,T)=\frac{2hv^3}{c^2(e^{\frac{hv}{kt}}<br /> -1)} where Bv(T) is the spectral radiance at frequency v and temperature T.
You want to find the position of maximum in terms of frequency. The constant 2h/c2 can be omitted, it does not influence the position of maximum.

But Wien's Displacement Law is a relation between wavelength and temperature http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/wien.html so you should work with Planck's Law in terms of wavelength. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_law

ehild

do not use the x2 and x2 buttons when you write a TeX command.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K