I Deriving Doppler Effect Frequency w/ Stationary Person & Moving Source

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Doppler effect formula for a stationary observer and a moving sound source. The key formula presented is v_t = v + v_s, where v_t is the total velocity observed, v is the speed of sound, and v_s is the speed of the sound source. It is noted that when the source moves away, the wavelength increases, resulting in a lower observed frequency. A question arises about why the speed of sound remains constant despite the movement of the source, with clarification that sound speed is determined by the medium, not the source's motion. The analogy of a person running on a moving train is used to illustrate the concept of relative velocity in different contexts.
annamal
Messages
393
Reaction score
33
Can you derive the formula for frequency observed from doppler effect with stationary person and moving sound source away from the person like this:
##v_t = v + v_s## where ##v_t## is the total velocity observed by stationary person from moving sound, v is velocity of sound and ##v_s## is velocity of sound source.
$$v = \lambda f$$
$$f_o = (v + v_s)/\lambda_o$$ where ##f_o## is frequency observed and ##\lambda_o## is wavelength observed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
annamal said:
... from doppler effect with stationary person and moving sound source away from the person ...
If moving away, the wavelength will be longer so the frequency will be lower.
Maybe you need to change the sign to (v - vs).
 
Baluncore said:
If moving away, the wavelength will be longer so the frequency will be lower.
Maybe you need to change the sign to (v - vs).
I guess my question is not very clear. What I am asking is why the velocity of sound is constant regardless of whether the source be moving. Wouldn't the velocity of sound be added to the speed of source? I am likening it to a person running on a moving train. To a stationary viewer the velocity of runner = velocity of runner on train + velocity of moving train.
 
annamal said:
What I am asking is why the velocity of sound is constant regardless of whether the source be moving. Wouldn't the velocity of sound be added to the speed of source?
Because sound is dependent only on the air. The speed is determined by the medium.
annamal said:
I am likening it to a person running on a moving train. To a stationary viewer the velocity of runner = velocity of runner on train + velocity of moving train.
If you put some air in a box and move the box, the then speed of a sound wave to an external observer IS the speed of the box plus the speed of sound in the box.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top