Deriving Equation (2) from Equation (1)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gu Jianjun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving Equation (2) from Equation (1) in the context of a research paper. The equations involve the function q(t,x) and its relationship with z(t,x) and the integral of k(τ,t)z(τ,x). The key to the derivation lies in applying Leibniz's rule for differentiating under the integral sign, which results in the term -k(t,t)z(t) emerging from the differentiation of the limits of integration. The process is confirmed through the application of the fundamental theorem of calculus and the chain rule.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives and notation, specifically ∂q/∂t and ∂z/∂t.
  • Familiarity with Leibniz's rule for differentiation under the integral sign.
  • Knowledge of the fundamental theorem of calculus.
  • Basic concepts of integral calculus and function relationships.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Leibniz's rule in detail, focusing on its applications in calculus.
  • Review the fundamental theorem of calculus and its implications for integrals.
  • Explore advanced topics in partial differential equations and their applications.
  • Practice deriving equations from integral forms using various calculus techniques.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in applied mathematics, and students studying calculus or differential equations will benefit from this discussion.

Gu Jianjun
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
recently, I study a research paper, and a problem confuse me, so i need help:

q(t,x)=z(t,x)+\int_t^T{k(\tau, t) z(\tau, x) d\tau } (1)

and q_t=z_t+\int_t^T{k_t(\tau, t) z(\tau, x) d\tau }- k(t,t)z(t) (2)

problem: how to according to (1) can get (2) ? please give me detailed process, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are asking, from
[tex]q(t,x)= z(t,x)+ \int_t^T\left(k(\tau,t)z(\tau,x)\right)d\tau[/tex]
how do you get
[tex]\frac{\partial q}{\partial t}= \frac{\partial z}{\partial t}+ \int_t^T\left(k_t(\tau,t)z(\tau,x)\right)d\tau - k(t,t)z(t)[/tex]

I hope the [itex]\partial z/\partial x[/itex] part at the front is obvious. The rest of it is from "Leibniz' rule"
[tex]\frac{d}{dx}\left(\int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} F(t,x) dt\right)= \frac{d\beta(x)}{dx}F(\beta(x),x)- \frac{d\alpha(x)}{dx}F(\alpha(x),x)+ \int_{\alpha(x)}^{\beta(x)} \frac{\partial F(x,t)}{\partial x} dt[/tex]
The first two terms of the right hand side are derivable from the "fundamental theorem of calculus" together with the chain rule. The third term is just taking the derivative inside the integral.

In your case, the "[itex]\beta(x)[/itex]" is a constant, T, so its derivative is 0. The "[itex]\alpha[/itex]" is t so its derivative is 1. That's where "-k(t,t)z(t)" comes from.
 
thank HallsofIvy very much , this is an important formula, I could not thought of it, oh, my god !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K