Deriving expression for magnetic field at point P due to current

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the magnetic field (B) at point P due to a current (I) using the Biot-Savart Law. The correct formula for B is established as $$B(x)=\frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi x}(\frac{a}{3\sqrt{x^2+\frac{a^2}{9}}}-\frac{2a}{3\sqrt{x^2+\frac{4a^2}{9}}})$$. Participants confirm that for large distances (x) compared to the source dimensions (a), the expression simplifies to an inverse square law, validating the derived formula. The discussion emphasizes the importance of including the correct terms in the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Biot-Savart Law
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their applications
  • Basic concepts of magnetic fields and their behavior at varying distances
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Biot-Savart Law in detail to understand its applications in electromagnetism
  • Learn advanced integration techniques relevant to physics problems
  • Explore the implications of the inverse square law in magnetic and electric fields
  • Investigate the effects of finite dimensions on magnetic field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and professionals involved in electromagnetism who seek to deepen their understanding of magnetic field derivations and applications.

jisbon
Messages
475
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
Derive an expression for the magnetic field at point P due to current-carrying wire of length a
Relevant Equations
NIL
1569135852657.png

So I think I do understand how to do this, but the thing is my answers are always incorrect. Will need some guidance/help on this.
##B =\frac{\mu_{0}I}{4\pi}\int\frac{dysin\theta}{r^2} ##
##y = Rtan\phi##
##dy = Rsec^2\phi d\phi##
##B = \frac{\mu_{0}I}{4\pi}\int\frac{dysin\theta}{r^2} = \frac{\mu_{0}I}{4\pi}\int\frac{Rsec^2\phi d\phi sin(\frac{\pi}{2}-\phi)}{R^2sec^2 \phi}
= \frac{\mu_{0}I}{4\pi}\int\frac{cos\phi}{R}d\phi = \frac{\mu_{0}I}{4\pi}(sin\phi_{2}-sin\phi_{1}) ##
1569136360318.png

So,
##sin\phi_{1}=\frac{2/3a}{\sqrt{4/9a^2+x^2}}##
##sin\phi_{2}=\frac{1/3a}{\sqrt{1/9a^2+x^2}} ##
##\frac{\mu_{0}I}{4\pi}(sin\phi_{2}-sin\phi_{1}) = \frac{\mu_{0}I}{4\pi} (\frac{1/3a}{\sqrt{1/9a^2+x^2}} - \frac{2/3a}{\sqrt{4/9a^2+x^2}})##

Is this correct?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is correct, just a typo you forgot the term ##\frac{1}{x}## or ##\frac{1}{R}## so the correct formula should be
$$B(x)=\frac{\mu_0 I}{4\pi x}(\frac{a}{3\sqrt{x^2+\frac{a^2}{9}}}-\frac{2a}{3\sqrt{x^2+\frac{4a^2}{9}}})$$One rule of thumb to check such expressions (for static electric or magnetic fields) is that for distances far away from the source (that must have finite dimensions) , you should get approximately an inverse square law, and such is the case here, for ##x## large (in comparison with ##a##) the ##x^2## term dominates in the square roots so each square root approximately simplifies to ##\sqrt{(x^2+0)}=x## and together with the other ##x## from outside the parenthesis we get an inverse square law.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
905
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
753
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K