Deriving Geodesic Deviation - Help Appreciated

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Isa1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deviation Geodesic
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
Isa1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm trying to understand the derivation of geodesic deviation given here:

http://wps.aw.com/wps/media/objects/500/512494/supplements/Ch21.pdf

but I can't figure out why x(t)+\chi(t) obeys the geodesic equation (eq.(7)). Of course x(t) does, since it is per definition a geodesic. Could it be that \chi(t) is so small that it is negligible and doesn't change the geodesic character of x(t)?

I'd really appreciate some help. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isa1 said:
Hi there,

I'm trying to understand the derivation of geodesic deviation given here:

http://wps.aw.com/wps/media/objects/500/512494/supplements/Ch21.pdf

but I can't figure out why x(t)+\chi(t) obeys the geodesic equation (eq.(7)). Of course x(t) does, since it is per definition a geodesic. Could it be that \chi(t) is so small that it is negligible and doesn't change the geodesic character of x(t)?

I'd really appreciate some help. Thanks!

It is because the point [tex]x(\tau)+\chi(\tau)[/tex] is in the beginning of the paper said to be on a nearby geodesic at the same proper time so no matter if [tex]\chi(\tau)[/tex] is small!

AB